Literature DB >> 21240777

Simulation-based teaching to improve cardiovascular exam skills performance among third-year medical students.

Donna H Kern1, Arch G Mainous, Maura Carey, Anne Beddingfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the need for improvement in cardiac physical examination skills training.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether the addition of simulation offers added benefit over training utilizing standardized patients only.
METHODS: All 124 third-year students who completed the required clerkship in one academic year received cardiac examination skills training utilizing a standardized patient and a cardiac simulator. The control group, comprising 281 students from 2 previous academic years, received training utilizing a standardized patient only. All students' physical exam skills were assessed in an objective structured clinical examination.
RESULTS: Students trained with cardiac simulation performed significantly better than the control group in all 5 cardiac skills. The number of students who correctly performed all 5 cardiac exam skills increased significantly (p=.004). Pulmonary exam skills were unchanged.
CONCLUSION: The use of simulation in addition to standardized patient teaching can improve students' performance of cardiac examination skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240777     DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  9 in total

Review 1.  Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James McKinney; David A Cook; David Wood; Rose Hatala
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Will clinical signs become myth? Developing structured Signs Circuits to improve medical students' exposure to and confidence examining clinical signs.

Authors:  Dominic Merriott; George Ransley; Shadman Aziz; Krushna Patel; Molly Rhodes; Deborah Abraham; Katba Imansouren; Daniel Turton
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

Review 3.  Physical examination in undergraduate medical education in the field of general practice - a scoping review.

Authors:  Dirk Moßhammer; Joachim Graf; Stefanie Joos; Rebekka Hertkorn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Fourth-year medical students do not perform a focused physical examination during a case-based simulation scenario.

Authors:  Leslie A Bilello; Nicole M Dubosh; Jason J Lewis; Matthew M Hall; Jonathan Fisher; Edward A Ullman
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-08-17

5.  Sustainability of physical exam skills in a resident-led curriculum in a large internal medicine program with competency based medical education.

Authors:  Don Thiwanka Wijeratne; Siddhartha Srivastava; Barry Chan; Wilma Hopman; Benjamin Thomson
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2018-11-12

6.  Dreyfus scale-based feedback increases the medical student's satisfaction with the complex cluster part of the interviewing and physical examination course and skills' readiness in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiau-Shian Huang; Chia-Chang Huang; Ying-Ying Yang; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Boaz Shulruf; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2019-10-11

7.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Kronschnabl; Christoph Baerwald; Daisy E Rotzoll
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-15

8.  Basic practical skills teaching and learning in undergraduate medical education - a review on methodological evidence.

Authors:  Daniela Vogel; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15

9.  Computer model for the cardiovascular system: development of an e-learning tool for teaching of medical students.

Authors:  David Roy Warriner; Martin Bayley; Yubing Shi; Patricia Victoria Lawford; Andrew Narracott; John Fenner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.