Literature DB >> 21240255

Amplification of the ch19p13.2 NACC1 locus in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.

Ie-Ming Shih1, Kentaro Nakayama, Gang Wu, Naomi Nakayama, Jinghui Zhang, Tian-Li Wang.   

Abstract

On the basis of digital karyotyping, we have identified a new, discrete amplified region at ch19p13.2 in a high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. To further characterize this region, we determined the frequency and biological significance of ch19p13.2 amplification by analyzing 341 high-grade serous carcinomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and found an increased DNA copy number at this locus in 18% of cases. We correlated the DNA and RNA copy number by analyzing the TCGA data set for all amplified genes and detected seven genes within ch19p13.2 that were significantly correlated (R≥0.54) and were, in fact, listed as the top 100 potential 'driver' genes at a genome-wide scale. Interestingly, one of the seven genes, NACC1, encoding NAC1 was previously reported to be involved in the development of tumor recurrence in ovarian serous carcinoma and to have a causal role in the development of paclitaxel resistance. Therefore, we selected NACC1 for validation in an independent cohort. On the basis of fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found that 35 (20%) of 175 high-grade serous carcinomas had an increased DNA copy number at the NACC1 locus, and those amplified cases were associated with early disease recurrence within 6 months (P=0.013). A significantly high level of NAC1 protein expression based on immunohistochemistry was detected in amplified tumors as compared with non-amplified tumors (P<0.005). In summary, our data suggest that amplification at the ch19p13.2 NACC1 locus, leading to NAC1 overexpression, is one of the molecular genetic alterations associated with early tumor recurrence in ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240255      PMCID: PMC3085564          DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most aggressive gynecologic malignancy. Ovarian cancer is composed of a diverse group of tumors that can be classified according to their distinctive morphologic and molecular features (1). Among them, high-grade serous carcinoma represents the major tumor type associated with frequent tumor recurrence and high mortality. In contrast to other subtypes, high-grade serous carcinomas are highly aggressive, evolve rapidly, and almost always present at advanced stage. Several studies have analyzed global DNA copy number alterations specifically in different types of ovarian epithelial carcinomas (2–8). The results from these reports indicate that high-grade serous carcinomas are characterized by higher levels of sub-chromosomal gains and losses than clear cell carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinomas, and their precursor lesions, serous borderline tumors. This finding suggests that chromosomal instability is more pronounced in high-grade serous carcinomas than other types of ovarian cancer. To identify new cancer-associated genes that may participate in the pathogenesis of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma, we have previously applied digital karyotyping (9) and, subsequently, SNP arrays to analyze somatic genome-wide DNA copy number alterations in purified ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma samples (2, 4, 10). As a result, in addition to several previously known amplified chromosomal regions containing CCNE1, AKT2, and PIK3CA loci, we identified several new amplified loci including chromosome (ch)11q13.5 harboring Rsf-1 (HBXAP) (11), chr19p13.12 harboring NOTCH3 (12), and regions at chr12p13, chr8q24 and chr19p13.2. Those regions containing known tumor-associated genes were validated using dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in an independent set of ovarian carcinomas (4). The purpose of this report is to study a previously uncharacterized amplified region at ch19p13.2. Based on digital karyotypic analysis in a limited set of clinical samples, we detected a discrete amplicon located at ch19p13.2 which has not been previously reported in ovarian cancer. This amplicon appears to be relatively large, encompassing 1.92 Mb and containing at least 60 coding sequences, which poses challenges for further investigation to identify the cancer “driver” gene(s) within this amplified region. Several genome database resources such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) have recently become available for public access, providing a hitherto unavailable opportunity for molecular genetic discovery in cancer. In this study, we take the advantage of the emerging dataset of the TCGA to simultaneously analyze mRNA and genomic DNA copy numbers for all genes within the digital karyotyping-defined ch9p13.2 amplicon in a large set of high-grade serous carcinomas. This approach enabled us to distinguish cancer “driver” genes from co-amplified “passenger” genes. We then validated our results using fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in an independent set of ovarian carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas database

Copy number variations of the ch9p13.2 amplicon in 343 ovarian tumor samples and paired normal samples were characterized using the Affymetrix SNP6.0 array by the Broad Institute (Boston). The intensity and log2 ratios for each probe set on the SNP array were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Portal (http://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/). Somatic copy number alterations were analyzed using the Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS) algorithm (13) with R package “DNACopy” (version 1.14.0, default setting). Regions with focal somatic copy number alterations were identified by GISTIC analysis in GenePattern (http://www.broadinstitute.org/cancer/software/ genepattern/) (14). Expression analysis of 377 ovarian tumor samples was performed using the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST Array by the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. The CEL files were downloaded from the TCGA Data Portal. The probe set signals were summarized as RMA scores with Affymetrix Power Tools (http://www.affymetrix.com/partners_programs/programs/developer/tools/ powertools.affx). The locations of all probe sets were obtained from the Affymetrix annotation file (HuEx-1_0-stv2.na29.hg18.probeset.csv). A total of 8,101 core probe sets (representing 590 genes) located at the regions with focal somatic copy number alterations were selected for expression-copy number correlation analysis. Copy number data and exon-array data were available for 341 cases; therefore this sample set was used for analysis in this study. For these samples, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated using the expression of each probe set and its corresponding copy number across the 341 cases. The distribution of correlation coefficients of all 8,101 probe sets is bimodal, separating the genes (probe sets) with no correlation (correlation coefficient below 0.2) from those that show correlations between DNA copy number and RNA expression.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

A total of 175 ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas were analyzed for DNA copy number within the ch19p13.2 region using two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Stage III or IV tumor tissues from patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were originally retrieved from the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. The acquisition of the anonymous tissue specimens for this study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board. The tissues were arranged in tissue microarrays to facilitate FISH and immunohistochemistry procedures. BAC clones (RP11-356L15 and CTD-2508D10) containing the genomic sequences of the ch19p13.2 amplicon were purchased from Bacpac Resources (Childrens' Hospital, Oakland, CA) and Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Bac clones located at ch19p12 (CTD-2518O18) were used to generate reference probes. The method for FISH was previously described (15). The hybridization signals were counted by two individuals. Signal ratios of experimental probe/reference probe greater than 2.5 were considered as gain, and signal ratios of experimental probe/reference greater than 3.5 were considered as high-fold amplification. At least 50 nuclei were counted for each specimen.

Immunohistochemistry

The NAC1 mouse monoclonal antibody used for immunohistochemistry was purchased from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO). The specificity of the antibody was previous demonstrated (16). Paraffin sections from the same tissue microarrays as used for FISH were deparaffinized and pretreated with low pH citrate buffer in a microwave oven for antigen retrieval. Tissue sections were incubated with the anti-NAC1 antibody at a dilution of 1:100 at 4°C overnight. Visualization was performed using the EnVision™+ peroxidase system (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Positive controls consisted of an ovarian carcinoma shown to be positive in a pilot study. Negative controls were stained with an isotype-matched mouse myeloma protein. Immunoreactivity was scored by two investigators who were blinded to the patient clinical data. Nuclear localization was interpreted as positive staining. Staining intensity was scored on a scale of 0–3, corresponding to undetectable, weak, moderate, and intense immunoreactivity in tumor cells (16). At least 500 tumor cells were counted for each specimen.

RESULTS

As a continuing effort to understand the molecular etiology of ovarian cancer, we have previously analyzed DNA copy number changes in different types of ovarian carcinoma. Based on digital karyotyping (9) in affinity-purified, high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas, we detected a discrete, novel amplified region located at ch19p13.2 in one of 7 specimens (Fig. 1A). This amplified locus was estimated to have ~17 copies of haploid genome and spanned 12,735,244 to 14,655,263, containing at least 60 genes. Based on this preliminary finding, we decided to determine the frequency of increased copy number at this region in a large set of high-grade serous carcinomas. First, we analyzed DNA copy number in 341 high-grade serous carcinomas from the TCGA ovarian cancer genome dataset. The results indicated that 18% of 341 high-grade serous carcinomas showed increased DNA copy numbers (>2.5) based on SNP arrays. If a higher cutoff value (>3.5) was applied, the fraction of amplified cases was 3%. To identify potential cancer “driver” genes within the ch19p13.2 amplicon, we correlated mRNA expression levels and DNA copy number at a genome wide scale in the same set of carcinomas. The rationale for this analysis is that, when amplified, “driver” genes almost always upregulate their expression, which enables their oncogenic functions. Based on this analysis, we listed the top 100 amplified genes with the highest correlation coefficient between DNA copy number and mRNA expression levels (as determined by Pearson correlation analysis (Table 1). Using this approach, we identified several amplicons harboring well-known amplified oncogenes, including CCNE1 (17), AKT2 (18), Pak1 (5), Rsf-1 (19) and Paf1 (20). Interestingly, chromosome 19 contained a very high number of candidate driver oncogenes. Among the top 100 genes, 54 genes were located at discrete subchromosomal regions of chromosome 19, indicating that frequent structural re-arrangement may occur in this chromosome in high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (Fig. 1B). Importantly, the ch19p13.2 region harbored 7 genes which showed the most significant correlation between DNA copy number and RNA expression level.
Fig. 1

Amplification at the ch19p13.2 region harboring NACC1. A. A focused view of the digital karyotyping result demonstrates a discrete amplicon spanning from nucleotide position 12,735,244 to 14,655,263 in a high-grade serous carcinoma. NACC1 is located within the amplicon. B. Analysis of the TCGA ovarian cancer dataset reveals 100 top genes showing the highest correlation coefficient between DNA copy number and RNA expression levels. Among them, 54 genes are located on chromosome 19. Their physical map is shown. Of note, three amplified chromosomal regions, 19p13.2, 19q12, and 19q13.1–19q13.2 harbor NACC1, CCNE1 and AKT2, respectively.

Table 1

The top 100 amplified potential “driver” genes in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas*.

GeneChrStartEndcorrelationfCN> 2.5fCN> 3.5
MRPS15chr136693996367025450.540.1570.017
NDUFS5chr139264593392728420.5480.1900.029
NFYCchr140950961410098430.5550.2010.029
CTPSchr141221558412507970.5610.2010.026
ANKRD17chr474159477742620830.5440.0550.020
TAF2chr81208126771209142240.5510.4750.050
DERL1chr81240950091241235330.6740.4840.055
C8orf76chr81243014381243227670.5450.4870.061
FAM91A1chr81248498931248942170.5470.4900.067
TRMT12chr81255322601255342170.5850.5010.073
RNF139chr81255561941255692800.6090.5010.073
TATDN1chr81255699371256002660.5730.5040.073
NDUFB9chr81256206091256313940.670.5070.076
SQLEchr81260807261261036900.5660.5100.085
KIAA0196chr81261057111261731120.5630.5100.082
NSMCE2chr81261733571264484290.5770.5130.082
FAM84Bchr81276338711276395620.5340.5390.085
TRAPPC9chr81407425881414686780.530.4870.061
EIF2C2chr81416105181417148140.5520.5040.079
PTK2chr81417381351420804830.5940.5190.093
TSTA3chr81447659381447700150.5920.4640.055
ZNF623chr81448029921448095530.540.4660.055
PUF60chr81449706931449831940.5890.4720.055
EXOSC4chr81451335221451355510.5260.4690.055
GPAA1chr81452095551452130550.5460.4690.055
CYC1chr81452220091452243240.6360.4690.055
MAF1chr81452313241452344690.5540.4720.055
DGAT1chr81455107691455213170.540.4780.050
CPSF1chr81455892951456053440.5440.4810.055
CYHR1chr81456600341456612760.610.4810.055
RPL8chr81459860021459882840.5890.4610.050
ZNF7chr81460252321460394060.550.4610.050
C8orf33chr81462778241462814160.5320.4430.058
UVRAGchr1175268572774687620.5380.1870.012
PRKRIRchr1175744310757400930.560.1840.023
C11orf30chr1175835631759391550.5840.1900.026
PAK1chr1176721458767811710.5810.2130.029
CLNS1Achr1177004989770264760.6380.2220.029
RSF1chr1177055016770560500.5580.2240.032
C11orf67chr1177209888772610430.560.2220.032
INTS4chr1177306760773068540.5420.2270.032
NDUFC2chr1177457655774687620.5370.2330.035
ALG8chr1177489671775282820.6120.2330.035
TM7SF3chr1227018069270585080.550.2480.023
MED21chr1227066787270738560.5850.2480.023
CCDC91chr1228410133287030990.5280.2220.020
ZNF136chr1912134940121597580.5410.1690.020
ZNF564chr1912497231125004870.5370.1720.026
ZNF791chr1912582753126010470.6050.1690.023
C19orf56chr1912639907126404140.6720.1750.023
MORG1chr1912645066126476120.5490.1750.023
DHPSchr1912647536126535220.6170.1780.023
FBXW9chr1912660756126683790.5410.1780.023
TNPO2chr1912671568126951720.6030.1780.023
C19orf43chr1912702580127064710.5630.1810.020
ASNA1chr1912709344127193950.6640.1810.020
TRMT1chr1913076853130884170.550.2160.032
NACC1chr1913108094131125370.5580.2160.032
STX10chr1913115892131220760.5570.2160.032
CCDC130chr1913723435137351010.6050.2300.041
C19orf53chr1913746303137502550.5610.2330.041
DNAJB1chr1914486600144900260.5850.2240.029
NDUFB7chr1914537895145438690.5950.2270.029
AKAP8chr1915464337154906030.5290.2510.029
USE1chr1917187243171916040.6080.2070.023
NR2F6chr1917203747172169950.5420.2100.023
C19orf62chr1917239287172510130.5890.2100.023
UQCRFS1chr1934390062343958650.5440.2220.070
POP4chr1934797996347984110.7470.2570.111
C19orf12chr1934883970348911600.5550.2620.117
CCNE1chr1934994774350070390.5780.2680.117
C19orf2chr1935125351351981760.7450.2620.111
ZNF507chr1937529996375424680.5320.1810.035
ZNF420chr1937569382376206620.5310.1720.020
ANKRD27chr1937779935377811200.6760.1870.038
CCDC123chr1938061790381547090.5450.1750.029
RHPN2chr1938161367381733890.5720.1750.026
PEPDchr1938569954385944910.5390.1630.023
LSM14Achr1939355265393555080.6280.1780.023
UBA2chr1939611147396526260.6070.1750.023
ZNF585Bchr1942368828423697710.5470.1780.023
ZNF383chr1942409209424188110.5460.1780.020
SPINT2chr1943447250434748120.630.1900.029
PSMD8chr1943557200435662160.6420.1840.029
EIF3Kchr1943806612438194250.6150.2010.029
ACTN4chr1943830180439129720.5810.2010.032
ECH1chr1943997942440142450.7150.1950.035
SIRT2chr1944061065440617780.5350.2040.050
SARS2chr1944097752441131530.5560.2010.050
SAMD4Bchr1944539177445657710.60.1980.052
PAF1chr1944568126445733440.7180.1980.052
MED29chr1944573856445824530.6570.1950.052
RPS16chr1944615726446184710.5560.1950.052
SUPT5Hchr1944628301446590540.6410.1900.052
TIMM50chr1944662966446728330.6570.1810.052
FBLchr1945016951450232560.5970.1660.041
PSMC4chr1945168950451791370.6860.1520.035
AKT2chr1945430106454830920.6680.1280.023
SERTAD3chr1945638677456403310.5390.1200.023
SHKBP1chr1945774650457890260.5730.1110.020

These genes showed the best correlation between DNA and copy number and RNA expression levels with R> 0.526 from the TCGA ovarian cancer dataset. Different chromosomes are indicated by different color highlights. Genes within the chr19p13.2 amplicon are in red fonts.

Chr: chromosome

To validate the above results obtained from in silica analysis, we applied two-color FISH and immunohistochemistry to an independent set of tumors composed of 175 high-grade serous carcinomas collected at our institution. We focused on one of the 7 candidate “driver” genes at ch19p13.2, NACC1, because as compared to the other 6 genes, the biological role of NACC1 has been previously reported. NAC1, encoded by NACC1, is a nuclear protein involved in stemness of embryonic stem cells (21) and in the pathogenesis of human cancer (16). NAC1 has been demonstrated to participate in the development of chemoresistant recurrent tumors (22, 23). In this study, we further determined if amplification of the NACC1 locus was related to early disease recurrence in high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. We designed FISH probes that hybridized to the NACC1 coding region and found that 35 (20%) of 175 carcinomas demonstrated gene copy number gain (> 2.5) at ch19p13.2. Furthermore, 8 (5%) of 175 tumors exhibited high level amplification (>3.5) in DNA copy number at this locus. An example of FISH in a high-grade serous carcinoma is shown in Fig. 2. Immunohistochemistry was used to estimate semi-quantitatively the protein expression levels of NAC1 based on immunostaining intensity in the same set of 175 tumor tissues. We observed that amplified tumors exhibited a significantly higher level of NAC1 expression than those without amplification (p< 0.005, Fisher's exact test). As shown in Table 2, the percentage of tumors with an immunostaining score of 3+ was 63%, 26%, and 13% in specimens showing high amplification, low level gain, and no amplification at the NACC1 locus, respectively. NAC1 immunoreactivity in representative amplified and non-amplified tumors is shown in Fig. 2B.
Fig. 2

DNA copy number at the NACC1 locus and NAC1 immunoreactivity from representative high-grade serous carcinomas. A. Two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization in two high-grade serous carcinomas shows increased signal of the ch19p13.2 probe (red fluorescence) whereas the control probe (green fluorescence) that hybridizes to a region near the ch19p12 does not shown any gain of intensity. The case on the left panel shows discrete red probe signals whereas the case on the right shows the homogeneously staining regions. The ideogram on the left illustrates the locations which hybridize to the ch19p13.2 probe (red bar) and to the ch19p12 control probe (green bar). B: Immunohistochemistry of NAC1. High-grade ovarian serous carcinomas with high levels of ch19p13.2 amplification show intense immunostaining (3+) of NAC1 in the nuclei (top panels). High-grade ovarian serous carcinomas without detectable alteration of DNA copy number at the ch19p13.2 show variable immunostaining intensity with staining scores ranging from 0 to 2+ (bottom panel). Immunostaining scores are indicated in each photomicrograph.

Table 2

Correlation of NACC1 DNA copy number and staining intensity in 175 high-grade serous carcinomas.

3+2+1+0Total
NACC1 amplification (copy number>3.5) 51208
NACC1 gain (3.5> copy number > 2.5 769527
Non-amplified 18453345140
Total 30524450175

Fisher's exact test p= 0.0047

Next, we asked whether NACC1 amplification was associated with amplification of other chromosomal loci, including CCNE1, RSF1, NOTCH3, AKT2, and PIK3CA, which were frequently amplified in high-grade serous carcinoma (4). The FISH results from the above genes were available in 146 cases and they were used for the correlation study. Based on FISH data and analysis using a 2×2 contingency table, we found that among these genes amplification of only the NOTCH3 locus (ch19p13.12) was significantly correlated with amplification at the ch19p13.2 locus (p = 0.0044) (Table 3). Among 175 high-grade serous carcinomas, we identified a subset of 52 primary tumors from patients whose follow-up information was available. These patients were selected also based on their similar clinical treatment outcome including optimal cytoreductive surgery (residual tumor< 0.5 cm) followed by a similar regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel therapy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. We observed that an increase in DNA copy number in the NACC1 locus significantly correlated with earlier recurrence (within 6 months after diagnosis) compared with those without amplification (p= 0.013) (Table 4).
Table 3

Co-amplification of NACC1 and NOTCH3 loci.

NOTCH3 amplifiedNOTCH3 non-amplifiedTotal
NACC1 amplified 151025
NACC1 non-amplified 3487121
Total 4997146

Fisher's exact test p= 0.0044

Table 4

Correlation of NACC1 locus amplification and the time to first recurrence.

Recur within 6 monthsRecur after 6 monthsTotal
NACC1 amplified 61016
NACC1 non-amplified 53136
Total 114152

Fisher's exact test p= 0.013

DISCUSSION

In this study, we provide new evidence that DNA copy number at the ch19p13.2 subchromosomal region is increased in approximately one fifth of high-grade serous carcinomas. This finding is based on two large independent cohorts, using two independent techniques including SNP arrays and FISH. The frequency of ch19p13.2 amplification is comparable to that at the CCNE1, NOTCH3, RSF1, AKT2, and PIK3CA loci which were found to be amplified in 36%, 32%, 16%,14%, and 11% of high-grade serous carcinomas, respectively (4). However, it is uncertain whether ch19p13.2 represents a discrete amplicon or a continuum of a larger region of DNA copy number gain in ch19p, perhaps involving the whole arm. The significant co-amplification event of ch19p13.2 and the NOTCH3 locus (ch19p13.12) suggests such a possibility given the proximal location of both loci. Nevertheless, based on our FISH and immunohistochemistry analysis of the same tumor samples, NAC1 expression likely depends on amplification within the ch19p13.2 amplicon. The above results have several important implications with respect to molecular genetic changes and pathogenesis of tumor recurrence in ovarian cancer. To determine the significance of amplified genes in human cancer, we applied an approach based on the rationale that a tumor-driving gene, when amplified, is almost always over-expressed, which activates the oncogenic pathway, while co-amplified “passenger” genes that are unrelated to tumor pathogenesis may or may not be over-expressed (24). Therefore, we analyzed all genes within all amplified regions detected by the TCGA ovarian cancer dataset to correlate DNA and transcript copy numbers within the same tumor samples. As a result, we have identified 100 genes with the most significant correlation between DNA copy numbers and RNA expression levels and have found that several ovarian cancer-associated oncogenes were on the list, including CCNE1 (17), AKT2 (18), Pak1 (5), Rsf-1 (19), and Paf1 (20). This finding, together with the data showing CCNE1 as the most frequently amplified region (copy number > 3.5) in ovarian serous carcinoma, supports the robustness of this approach in identifying potential cancer driver genes within amplicons. From this perspective, we found that NACC1 was listed with an R value as high as 0.558. This finding suggests that NACC1 is one of the genes that contribute to tumor progression in ovarian cancer in which ch19p13.2 amplification is found. Of note, analysis of the 100 top gene list reveals that the majority of the amplified ovarian cancer driver genes are located on three chromosomes, 8, 11, and 19, a finding consistent with our previous FISH study that profiled all amplicons in ovarian serous carcinoma (4). This information may provide a potential roadmap to study the pathogenesis of ovarian serous carcinoma in the future. The association of the ch19p13.2 amplification and shorter disease relapse time may be related to NAC1 overexpression. NAC1, encoded by NACC1, belongs to the BTB/POZ domain gene family and contains the BTB/POZ domain, which is responsible for homodimerization and heterodimerization with other BTB/POZ proteins as well as the BEN domain that mediate protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions during chromatin organization and transcription (25). The role of NAC1 in the development of human cancer has recently emerged. NAC1 is significantly overexpressed in several types of human cancers including ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (16, 22, 26, 27), endometrial carcinoma (28), and cervical carcinoma (29). Like several BTB/POZ family members, NAC1 proteins homo-dimerize through the BTB domain. Induced expression of a NAC1 deletion mutant (N130) containing exclusively the BTB domain attenuates the tumor-promoting functions of NAC1 (16). On the other hand, over-expression of full-length NAC1 is sufficient to enhance tumorigenicity of ovarian surface epithelial cells and NIH3T3 cells in athymic nu/nu mice (16). More recently, we observed that enforced expression of NAC1 conferred drug resistance, and NAC1 knockdown by shRNA sensitized paclitaxel cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer cells in vitro (22). NAC1 contributed to the development of drug resistance through multiple mechanisms including upregulating fatty acid synthase (30) and negatively regulating the components of the Gadd45 tumor suppressor pathway including Gadd45α and its binding protein, Gadd45gip1 (22, 26). The above findings may explain the clinical observation that upregulation of NAC1 immunoreactivity in primary ovarian tumors is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and tumor recurrence in ovarian cancer patients (16, 27). We did not attempt to analyze the clinical correlation of NACC1 amplification using the TCGA dataset because of concerns about the difference in treatment regimens and patient populations from the various institutions that contributed to the dataset. The frequent co-amplification of the NACC1 and NOTCH3 is of interest. Our previous studies showed amplification of the NOTCH3 locus in 32% of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (12), and Notch3 overexpression is related to the recurrence of ovarian cancer and confers drug resistance (31). Ovarian cancer cells which had amplified and overexpressed Notch3 were dependent on Notch3 signaling for cellular survival and growth. Thus, it is likely that increased DNA copy number in both genes may contribute to the resistance of carboplatin and paclitaxel that are routinely used in treating advanced stage ovarian cancer patients. Interestingly, we have recently demonstrated that inactivation of the Notch3 pathway led to inhibition of NAC1 expression, indicating that Notch3 signaling may regulate the expression of NAC1 (31). Further studies are required to confirm the molecular cross talk between these pathways in the development of chemoresistance. In summary, based on analysis of the TCGA ovarian cancer dataset and our FISH result, we were able to demonstrate that amplification at the NACC1 locus was one of the frequent molecular genetic alterations in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas. NAC1 overexpression may be, in part, attributed to the increase in DNA copy number, explaining why amplification at the NACC1 locus is related to early tumor recurrence in ovarian cancer. Future studies should aim at fine mapping the ch19p13.2 amplified region and assessing the potential of other genes at the ch19p13.2 locus to contribute to the aggressive behavior of ovarian serous carcinomas that harbor this amplification.
  30 in total

1.  GenePattern 2.0.

Authors:  Michael Reich; Ted Liefeld; Joshua Gould; Jim Lerner; Pablo Tamayo; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data.

Authors:  E S Venkatraman; Adam B Olshen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Notch3 gene amplification in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joon T Park; Mei Li; Kentaro Nakayama; Tsui-Lien Mao; Ben Davidson; Zhen Zhang; Robert J Kurman; Charles G Eberhart; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  DNA copy numbers profiles in affinity-purified ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kuan-Ting Kuo; Tsui-Lien Mao; Xu Chen; Yuanjian Feng; Kentaro Nakayama; Yue Wang; Ruth Glas; M Joe Ma; Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A BTB/POZ protein, NAC-1, is related to tumor recurrence and is essential for tumor growth and survival.

Authors:  Kentaro Nakayama; Naomi Nakayama; Ben Davidson; Jim J-C Sheu; Natini Jinawath; Antonio Santillan; Ritu Salani; Robert E Bristow; Patrice J Morin; Robert J Kurman; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cyclin E expression is a significant predictor of survival in advanced, suboptimally debulked ovarian epithelial cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  John Farley; Leia M Smith; Kathleen M Darcy; Eugene Sobel; Dennis O'Connor; Benita Henderson; Larry E Morrison; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Digital karyotyping identifies thymidylate synthase amplification as a mechanism of resistance to 5-fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Tian-Li Wang; Luis A Diaz; Katharine Romans; Alberto Bardelli; Saurabh Saha; Gennaro Galizia; Michael Choti; Ross Donehower; Giovanni Parmigiani; Ie-Ming Shih; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christoph Lengauer; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Analysis of DNA copy number alterations in ovarian serous tumors identifies new molecular genetic changes in low-grade and high-grade carcinomas.

Authors:  Kuan-Ting Kuo; Bin Guan; Yuanjian Feng; Tsui-Lien Mao; Xu Chen; Natini Jinawath; Yue Wang; Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  AKT2, a putative oncogene encoding a member of a subfamily of protein-serine/threonine kinases, is amplified in human ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  J Q Cheng; A K Godwin; A Bellacosa; T Taguchi; T F Franke; T C Hamilton; P N Tsichlis; J R Testa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Expression and clinical role of the bric-a-brac tramtrack broad complex/poxvirus and zinc protein NAC-1 in ovarian carcinoma effusions.

Authors:  Ben Davidson; Aasmund Berner; Claes G Trope'; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  24 in total

1.  Dysfunction of nucleus accumbens-1 activates cellular senescence and inhibits tumor cell proliferation and oncogenesis.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Yan Cheng; Xingcong Ren; Tsukasa Hori; Kathryn J Huber-Keener; Li Zhang; Kai Lee Yap; David Liu; Lisa Shantz; Zheng-Hong Qin; Suping Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Ie-Ming Shih; Jin-Ming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Deciphering the associations between gene expression and copy number alteration using a sparse double Laplacian shrinkage approach.

Authors:  Xingjie Shi; Qing Zhao; Jian Huang; Yang Xie; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Identification of the NAC1-regulated genes in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Min Gao; Ren-Chin Wu; Alice L Herlinger; Kailee Yap; Jung-Won Kim; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Identification of a small-molecule compound that inhibits homodimerization of oncogenic NAC1 protein and sensitizes cancer cells to anticancer agents.

Authors:  XiaoHui Wang; Cheng Ji; HongHan Zhang; Yu Shan; YiJie Ren; YanWei Hu; LiangRong Shi; LingChuan Guo; WeiDong Zhu; YuJuan Xia; BeiJia Liu; ZiYun Rong; BiLian Wu; ZhiJun Ming; XingCong Ren; JianXun Song; JinMing Yang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Multivariate hypergeometric similarity measure.

Authors:  Chanchala D Kaddi; R Mitchell Parry; May D Wang
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  NAC1 is an actin-binding protein that is essential for effective cytokinesis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Kai Lee Yap; Stephanie I Fraley; Michelle M Thiaville; Natini Jinawath; Kentaro Nakayama; Jianlong Wang; Tian-Li Wang; Denis Wirtz; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Rsf-1, a chromatin remodelling protein, interacts with cyclin E1 and promotes tumour development.

Authors:  Jim Jinn-Chyuan Sheu; Jung Hye Choi; Bin Guan; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Chun-Hung Hua; Ming-Tsung Lai; Tian-Li Wang; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  The hypusine cascade promotes cancer progression and metastasis through the regulation of RhoA in squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  T Muramatsu; K-I Kozaki; S Imoto; R Yamaguchi; H Tsuda; T Kawano; N Fujiwara; M Morishita; S Miyano; J Inazawa
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  miR-339-5p inhibits migration and invasion in ovarian cancer cell lines by targeting NACC1 and BCL6.

Authors:  Weiwei Shan; Jun Li; Yang Bai; Xin Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-09

10.  A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.

Authors:  Birte Möhlendick; Christoph Bartenhagen; Bianca Behrens; Ellen Honisch; Katharina Raba; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.