OBJECTIVE: To pilot the efficacy and safety data of lamotrigine adjunctive therapy to lithium and divalproex in patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) and a recent substance use disorder (SUD). METHOD: Structured clinical interviews were used to ascertain DSM-IV diagnosis of RCBD, SUDs, and other Axis I disorders. Patients who did not meet the criteria for a bimodal response after up to 16-weeks of open-label treatment with lithium plus divalproex, as measured by MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) ≤ 19, YMRS ( Young Mania Rating Scale) ≤ 12 and GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) = 51 for 4 weeks, were randomized to a 12- week, double-blind addition of lamotrigine or placebo to lithium plus divalproex. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed with ANCOVA, t-test, or chi-square/Fisher's exact. RESULTS: Of 98 patients enrolled into the study, 36 were randomized to receivelamotrigine (n = 18) or placebo (n ± 18), and 8 patients per arm completed the study. No patient discontinued due to adverse events. The change in MADRS total score from baseline to endpoint was -9.1 ± 11.2 in lamotrigine-treated patients versus -4.5 ± 13.1 in placebo-treated patients (p = 0.27). There were no significant differences in changes in YMRS total scores and rates of response or remission. CONCLUSIONS:Lamotrigine adjunctive therapy was well tolerated in patients previously non-responsive to initial treatment of lithium plusdivalproex. A larger study is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lamotrigine versus placebo in RCBD with a recent SUD.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To pilot the efficacy and safety data of lamotrigine adjunctive therapy to lithium and divalproex in patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) and a recent substance use disorder (SUD). METHOD: Structured clinical interviews were used to ascertain DSM-IV diagnosis of RCBD, SUDs, and other Axis I disorders. Patients who did not meet the criteria for a bimodal response after up to 16-weeks of open-label treatment with lithium plus divalproex, as measured by MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) ≤ 19, YMRS ( Young Mania Rating Scale) ≤ 12 and GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) = 51 for 4 weeks, were randomized to a 12- week, double-blind addition of lamotrigine or placebo to lithium plus divalproex. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed with ANCOVA, t-test, or chi-square/Fisher's exact. RESULTS: Of 98 patients enrolled into the study, 36 were randomized to receive lamotrigine (n = 18) or placebo (n ± 18), and 8 patients per arm completed the study. No patient discontinued due to adverse events. The change in MADRS total score from baseline to endpoint was -9.1 ± 11.2 in lamotrigine-treated patients versus -4.5 ± 13.1 in placebo-treated patients (p = 0.27). There were no significant differences in changes in YMRS total scores and rates of response or remission. CONCLUSIONS:Lamotrigine adjunctive therapy was well tolerated in patients previously non-responsive to initial treatment of lithium plus divalproex. A larger study is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lamotrigine versus placebo in RCBD with a recent SUD.
Authors: Mani N Pavuluri; David B Henry; Melissa Moss; Tahseen Mohammed; Julie A Carbray; John A Sweeney Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Martha Sajatovic; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Jane A West; Kristin A Cassidy; Roknedin Safavi; Amy M Kilbourne; Frederic C Blow Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Joseph R Calabrese; Russell F Huffman; Robin L White; Suzanne Edwards; Thomas R Thompson; John A Ascher; Eileen T Monaghan; Robert A Leadbetter Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: John R Geddes; Guy M Goodwin; Jennifer Rendell; Jean-Michel Azorin; Andrea Cipriani; Michael J Ostacher; Richard Morriss; Nicola Alder; Ed Juszczak Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Terence A Ketter; John O Brooks; Jennifer C Hoblyn; Laurel M Champion; Jennifer Y Nam; Jenifer L Culver; Wendy K Marsh; Julie C Bonner Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Marc L M van der Loos; Paul G H Mulder; Erwin G Th M Hartong; Marc B J Blom; Anton C Vergouwen; Herman J U E M de Keyzer; Peter J H Notten; Marijke L Luteijn; Manuela A Timmermans; Eduard Vieta; Willem A Nolen Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Joseph F Goldberg; Mary E Kelley; Klara J Rosenquist; Douglas J Hsu; Megan M Filkowski; S Nassir Ghaemi Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: David E Kemp; Keming Gao; Stephen J Ganocy; Omar Elhaj; Sarah R Bilali; Carla Conroy; Robert L Findling; Joseph R Calabrese Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Vicki C Fung; Lindsay N Overhage; Louisa G Sylvia; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Masoud Kamali; Keming Gao; Richard C Shelton; Terence A Ketter; William V Bobo; Michael E Thase; Joseph R Calabrese; Mauricio Tohen; Thilo Deckersbach; Andrew A Nierenberg Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: David E Kemp; Keming Gao; Elizabeth B Fein; Philip K Chan; Carla Conroy; Sarah Obral; Stephen J Ganocy; Joseph R Calabrese Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 6.744