Literature DB >> 21239989

Recurrence of perinatal lethal osteogenesis imperfecta in sibships: parsing the risk between parental mosaicism for dominant mutations and autosomal recessive inheritance.

Shawna M Pyott1, Melanie G Pepin, Ulrike Schwarze, Kathleen Yang, Gretchen Smith, Peter H Byers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta in families results from either dominant (parental mosaicism) or recessive inheritance. The proportion of these two mechanisms is not known, and determination of the contribution of each is important to structure genetic counseling for these families.
METHODS: We measured the recurrence rate of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta after the birth of an affected infant. We determined the rate of parental mosaicism in a subset of families in which we had identified dominant mutations. In 37 families in which two or more affected infants were born, we identified mutations and determined the proportion that resulted from recessive inheritance.
RESULTS: The recurrence rate after the first affected pregnancy was 1.3%. The rate of parental mosaicism in families in which a dominant mutation was identified in a first affected child was 16%. In 37 families with two affected infants, 26 had dominant mutations, seven had recessive mutations, and we failed to find mutations in four. The overall recurrence rate for couples after two or more affected infants was 32%; 27% for families with parental mosaicism, 31% for recessive mutations, and 50% for families with no identified mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: In most populations, recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta usually results from parental mosaicism for dominant mutations, but the carrier frequency of recessive forms of osteogenesis imperfecta will alter that proportion. Mutation identification is an important tool to assess risk and facilitate prenatal or preimplantation diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239989     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318202e0f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  19 in total

1.  Parental mosaicism is a pitfall in preimplantation genetic diagnosis of dominant disorders.

Authors:  Julie Steffann; Caroline Michot; Roxana Borghese; Marcia Baptista-Fernandes; Sophie Monnot; Jean-Paul Bonnefont; Arnold Munnich
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Special form of osteoporosis in a 53-year-old man.

Authors:  Simon Lampart; Silvia Azzarello-Burri; Christoph Henzen; Stefan Fischli
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-12-13

3.  Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Jonathan R Stewart; Regis A James; James R Lupski; Paweł Stankiewicz; Peter Olofsson; Chad A Shaw
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genetic analysis of osteogenesis imperfecta in the Palestinian population: molecular screening of 49 affected families.

Authors:  Osama Essawi; Sofie Symoens; Maha Fannana; Mohammad Darwish; Mohammad Farraj; Andy Willaert; Tamer Essawi; Bert Callewaert; Anne De Paepe; Fransiska Malfait; Paul J Coucke
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Cytoplasmic body pathology in severe ACTA1-related myopathy in the absence of typical nemaline rods.

Authors:  Sandra Donkervoort; Sophelia H S Chan; Leslie H Hayes; Nathaniel Bradley; David Nguyen; Meganne E Leach; Payam Mohassel; Ying Hu; Mathula Thangarajh; Diana Bharucha-Goebel; Amanda Kan; Ronnie S L Ho; Christine A Reyes; Jessica Nance; Steven A Moore; A Reghan Foley; Carsten G Bönnemann
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.296

6.  COL1A1 C-propeptide mutations cause ER mislocalization of procollagen and impair C-terminal procollagen processing.

Authors:  Aileen M Barnes; Aarthi Ashok; Elena N Makareeva; Marina Brusel; Wayne A Cabral; MaryAnn Weis; Catherine Moali; Emmanuel Bettler; David R Eyre; John P Cassella; Sergey Leikin; David J S Hulmes; Efrat Kessler; Joan C Marini
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.187

7.  Mosaicism for dominant collagen 6 mutations as a cause for intrafamilial phenotypic variability.

Authors:  Sandra Donkervoort; Ying Hu; Tanya Stojkovic; Nicol C Voermans; A Reghan Foley; Meganne E Leach; Jahannaz Dastgir; Véronique Bolduc; Thomas Cullup; Alix de Becdelièvre; Lin Yang; Hai Su; Katherine Meilleur; Alice B Schindler; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Pascale Richard; Russell J Butterfield; Thomas L Winder; Thomas O Crawford; Robert B Weiss; Francesco Muntoni; Valérie Allamand; Carsten G Bönnemann
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Review with Clinical Examples.

Authors:  F S van Dijk; J M Cobben; A Kariminejad; A Maugeri; P G J Nikkels; R R van Rijn; G Pals
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2011-10-12

9.  EMQN best practice guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Fleur S van Dijk; Peter H Byers; Raymond Dalgleish; Fransiska Malfait; Alessandra Maugeri; Marianne Rohrbach; Sofie Symoens; Erik A Sistermans; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Identification of a novel heterozygous mutation in exon 50 of the COL1A1 gene causing osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  S A S Aftab; N Reddy; N L Owen; R Pollitt; A Harte; P G McTernan; G Tripathi; T M Barber
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.