PURPOSE: Recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta in families results from either dominant (parental mosaicism) or recessive inheritance. The proportion of these two mechanisms is not known, and determination of the contribution of each is important to structure genetic counseling for these families. METHODS: We measured the recurrence rate of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta after the birth of an affected infant. We determined the rate of parental mosaicism in a subset of families in which we had identified dominant mutations. In 37 families in which two or more affected infants were born, we identified mutations and determined the proportion that resulted from recessive inheritance. RESULTS: The recurrence rate after the first affected pregnancy was 1.3%. The rate of parental mosaicism in families in which a dominant mutation was identified in a first affected child was 16%. In 37 families with two affected infants, 26 had dominant mutations, seven had recessive mutations, and we failed to find mutations in four. The overall recurrence rate for couples after two or more affected infants was 32%; 27% for families with parental mosaicism, 31% for recessive mutations, and 50% for families with no identified mutation. CONCLUSIONS: In most populations, recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta usually results from parental mosaicism for dominant mutations, but the carrier frequency of recessive forms of osteogenesis imperfecta will alter that proportion. Mutation identification is an important tool to assess risk and facilitate prenatal or preimplantation diagnosis.
PURPOSE: Recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta in families results from either dominant (parental mosaicism) or recessive inheritance. The proportion of these two mechanisms is not known, and determination of the contribution of each is important to structure genetic counseling for these families. METHODS: We measured the recurrence rate of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta after the birth of an affected infant. We determined the rate of parental mosaicism in a subset of families in which we had identified dominant mutations. In 37 families in which two or more affected infants were born, we identified mutations and determined the proportion that resulted from recessive inheritance. RESULTS: The recurrence rate after the first affected pregnancy was 1.3%. The rate of parental mosaicism in families in which a dominant mutation was identified in a first affected child was 16%. In 37 families with two affected infants, 26 had dominant mutations, seven had recessive mutations, and we failed to find mutations in four. The overall recurrence rate for couples after two or more affected infants was 32%; 27% for families with parental mosaicism, 31% for recessive mutations, and 50% for families with no identified mutation. CONCLUSIONS: In most populations, recurrence of lethal osteogenesis imperfecta usually results from parental mosaicism for dominant mutations, but the carrier frequency of recessive forms of osteogenesis imperfecta will alter that proportion. Mutation identification is an important tool to assess risk and facilitate prenatal or preimplantation diagnosis.
Authors: Ian M Campbell; Jonathan R Stewart; Regis A James; James R Lupski; Paweł Stankiewicz; Peter Olofsson; Chad A Shaw Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Osama Essawi; Sofie Symoens; Maha Fannana; Mohammad Darwish; Mohammad Farraj; Andy Willaert; Tamer Essawi; Bert Callewaert; Anne De Paepe; Fransiska Malfait; Paul J Coucke Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2017-11-18 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Sandra Donkervoort; Sophelia H S Chan; Leslie H Hayes; Nathaniel Bradley; David Nguyen; Meganne E Leach; Payam Mohassel; Ying Hu; Mathula Thangarajh; Diana Bharucha-Goebel; Amanda Kan; Ronnie S L Ho; Christine A Reyes; Jessica Nance; Steven A Moore; A Reghan Foley; Carsten G Bönnemann Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Aileen M Barnes; Aarthi Ashok; Elena N Makareeva; Marina Brusel; Wayne A Cabral; MaryAnn Weis; Catherine Moali; Emmanuel Bettler; David R Eyre; John P Cassella; Sergey Leikin; David J S Hulmes; Efrat Kessler; Joan C Marini Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 5.187
Authors: Sandra Donkervoort; Ying Hu; Tanya Stojkovic; Nicol C Voermans; A Reghan Foley; Meganne E Leach; Jahannaz Dastgir; Véronique Bolduc; Thomas Cullup; Alix de Becdelièvre; Lin Yang; Hai Su; Katherine Meilleur; Alice B Schindler; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Pascale Richard; Russell J Butterfield; Thomas L Winder; Thomas O Crawford; Robert B Weiss; Francesco Muntoni; Valérie Allamand; Carsten G Bönnemann Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Fleur S van Dijk; Peter H Byers; Raymond Dalgleish; Fransiska Malfait; Alessandra Maugeri; Marianne Rohrbach; Sofie Symoens; Erik A Sistermans; Gerard Pals Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: S A S Aftab; N Reddy; N L Owen; R Pollitt; A Harte; P G McTernan; G Tripathi; T M Barber Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep Date: 2013-07-01