Literature DB >> 21239980

Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.

Doenja M J Lambregts1, Geerard L Beets, Monique Maas, Alfons G H Kessels, Frans C H Bakers, Vincent C Cappendijk, Sanne M E Engelen, Max J Lahaye, Adriaan P de Bruïne, Guido Lammering, Tim Leiner, Jan L Verwoerd, Joachim E Wildberger, Regina G H Beets-Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative assessment of nodal disease in rectal cancer impacts treatment management. Staging with modern imaging techniques (computed tomography, MRI and endorectal ultrasound) is insufficiently accurate for clinical decision making. This study aims to assess the accuracy of MRI using a novel lymph node magnetic resonance contrast, gadofosveset, for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer using a per node comparison with histology as the reference standard.
METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent gadofosveset-enhanced MRI at 1.5T. Twenty-six patients (primary staging group I) were treated with total mesorectal excision (with or without preoperative 5 × 5 Gy) and 42 (restaging group II) underwent a long course of chemoradiation followed by a restaging MRI and resection. Nodes were scored as benign or malignant by 2 radiologists (experienced and junior reader) first on standard MRI, then on gadofosveset-enhanced MRI. For group I the primary staging MRI was compared with histology. In group II the second, restaging MRI was compared with histology.
RESULTS: For the experienced reader, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC-curve (AUC) improved from 76%, 82% and 0.84 on standard MRI to 80%, 97% and 0.96 on gadofosveset-MRI (P < 0.001). For the junior reader results improved from 69%, 85%, and 0.85 on standard MRI to 70%, 95%, and 0.93 on gadofosveset-MRI (P = 0.03). Interobserver agreement was good on both standard MRI (κ 0.73) and gadofosveset-MRI (κ 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows high reproducibility and significantly improved accuracy compared to standard MRI for gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239980     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b01f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  40 in total

1.  Non-invasive MR assessment of macroscopic and microscopic vascular abnormalities in the rectal tumour-surrounding mesorectum.

Authors:  Ewelina Kluza; Jean-Paul J E Kleijnen; Milou H Martens; Dorit Rennspiess; Monique Maas; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Robert G Riedl; Axel zur Hausen; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles F Bellows; Bernard Jaffe; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Guiseppe Gagliardi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-28

Review 3.  Predicting complete response: is there a role for non-operative management of rectal cancer?

Authors:  T Jonathan Yang; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

4.  Surgery is essential in squamous cell cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  D C Steinemann; P C Müller; A T Billeter; T Bruckner; A Ulrich; B P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Tumor-induced alterations in lymph node lymph drainage identified by contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Alanna Ruddell; Sara B Kirschbaum; Sheila N Ganti; Cheng-Liang Liu; Ryan R Sun; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Performance of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for staging rectal cancer nodes: can the initial promising results be reproduced?

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Doenja M J Lambregts; Milou H Martens; Monique Maas; Frans C H Bakers; Vincent C Cappendijk; Pedro Oliveira; Guido Lammering; Robert G Riedl; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a 5-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Mechteld C de Jong; Ronald M van Dam; Monique Maas; Marc H A Bemelmans; Steven W M Olde Damink; Geerard L Beets; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Susanne Bonekamp; Vivek Gowdra Halappa; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; John Eng; Celia Pamela Corona-Villalobos; Timothy M Pawlik; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  p27 expression in post-treatment rectal cancer: a potential novel approach for predicting residual nodal disease.

Authors:  Tobias Leibold; Vanessa W Hui; Jinru Shia; Jeannine A Ruby; Elyn R Riedel; José G Guillem
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.