BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Maximizing the durability of viral suppression is a key goal of antiretroviral therapy. The objective of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 372A was to determine whether the intensification strategy of adding abacavir to an effective indinavir-dual nucleoside regimen would delay the time to virologic failure. METHODS:Zidovudine-experienced subjects (n=229) on therapy withindinavir + zidovudine + lamivudine with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels<500 copies/mL were randomized to abacavir 300 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the time to treatment failure, defined as a composite of confirmed virologic failure (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNAs>200 copies/mL) and treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: At baseline, the study population was 88% male with a median age of 41 years and median CD4 cell count of 250/mm3. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. The primary endpoint was reached in 61/116 of abacavir versus 62/113 of placebo recipients (P=.77); virologic failure occurred in 34/116 and 42/113 patients, respectively (P=.22). There were no differences in the proportions of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL, in CD4 cell count increases, nor adverse events between the arms. In the study, 17% of subjects developed nephrolithiasis, 2% experienced abacavir hypersensitivity, and 4.8% experienced at least 1 serious cardiovascular event (7 [6%] in the abacavir arm, 4 [3.5%] in the placebo arm). In additional secondary and post hoc analyses, rates of intermittent viremia, suppression below a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of 6 copies/mL, and HIV-1 proviral DNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were not significantly different in the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of intensification with abacavir in patients who are virologically suppressed on a stable antiretroviral regimen does not confer a clinical or virologic benefit. As antiretroviral regimens have become more potent since this trial was completed, it will be even more difficult to prove that late intensification of already virologically suppressed patients will add benefit. However, studies are warranted with drugs with new mechanisms of action to determine whether the level of persistent viremia below 50 copies/ mL can be further reduced and what influence this may have on latent HIV reservoirs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Maximizing the durability of viral suppression is a key goal of antiretroviral therapy. The objective of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 372A was to determine whether the intensification strategy of adding abacavir to an effective indinavir-dual nucleoside regimen would delay the time to virologic failure. METHODS:Zidovudine-experienced subjects (n=229) on therapy with indinavir + zidovudine + lamivudine with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels<500 copies/mL were randomized to abacavir 300 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the time to treatment failure, defined as a composite of confirmed virologic failure (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNAs>200 copies/mL) and treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: At baseline, the study population was 88% male with a median age of 41 years and median CD4 cell count of 250/mm3. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. The primary endpoint was reached in 61/116 of abacavir versus 62/113 of placebo recipients (P=.77); virologic failure occurred in 34/116 and 42/113 patients, respectively (P=.22). There were no differences in the proportions of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL, in CD4 cell count increases, nor adverse events between the arms. In the study, 17% of subjects developed nephrolithiasis, 2% experienced abacavirhypersensitivity, and 4.8% experienced at least 1 serious cardiovascular event (7 [6%] in the abacavir arm, 4 [3.5%] in the placebo arm). In additional secondary and post hoc analyses, rates of intermittent viremia, suppression below a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of 6 copies/mL, and HIV-1 proviral DNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were not significantly different in the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of intensification with abacavir in patients who are virologically suppressed on a stable antiretroviral regimen does not confer a clinical or virologic benefit. As antiretroviral regimens have become more potent since this trial was completed, it will be even more difficult to prove that late intensification of already virologically suppressed patients will add benefit. However, studies are warranted with drugs with new mechanisms of action to determine whether the level of persistent viremia below 50 copies/ mL can be further reduced and what influence this may have on latent HIV reservoirs.
Authors: Douglas D Richman; David M Margolis; Martin Delaney; Warner C Greene; Daria Hazuda; Roger J Pomerantz Journal: Science Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Maria J Buzón; Marta Massanella; Josep M Llibre; Anna Esteve; Viktor Dahl; Maria C Puertas; Josep M Gatell; Pere Domingo; Roger Paredes; Mark Sharkey; Sarah Palmer; Mario Stevenson; Bonaventura Clotet; Julià Blanco; Javier Martinez-Picado Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: D McMahon; J Jones; A Wiegand; S J Gange; M Kearney; S Palmer; S McNulty; J A Metcalf; E Acosta; C Rehm; J M Coffin; J W Mellors; F Maldarelli Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Steven A Yukl; Amandeep K Shergill; Kenneth McQuaid; Sara Gianella; Harry Lampiris; C Bradley Hare; Mark Pandori; Elizabeth Sinclair; Huldrych F Günthard; Marek Fischer; Joseph K Wong; Diane V Havlir Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nancie M Archin; Manzoor Cheema; Daniel Parker; Ann Wiegand; Ronald J Bosch; John M Coffin; Joseph Eron; Myron Cohen; David M Margolis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cindy H Brothers; Jaime E Hernandez; Amy G Cutrell; Lloyd Curtis; Mounir Ait-Khaled; Steve J Bowlin; Sara H Hughes; Jane M Yeo; Didier H Lapierre Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Deborah Persaud; Stuart C Ray; Joleen Kajdas; Aima Ahonkhai; George K Siberry; Kimberly Ferguson; Carrie Ziemniak; Thomas C Quinn; Joseph P Casazza; Steven Zeichner; Stephen J Gange; Douglas C Watson Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Rajesh T Gandhi; Lu Zheng; Ronald J Bosch; Ellen S Chan; David M Margolis; Sarah Read; Beatrice Kallungal; Sarah Palmer; Kathy Medvik; Michael M Lederman; Nadia Alatrakchi; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Ann Wiegand; Mary Kearney; John M Coffin; John W Mellors; Joseph J Eron Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Caroline A Sabin; Signe W Worm; Rainer Weber; Peter Reiss; Wafaa El-Sadr; Francois Dabis; Stephane De Wit; Matthew Law; Antonella D'Arminio Monforte; Nina Friis-Møller; Ole Kirk; Christian Pradier; Ian Weller; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Frank Maldarelli; Sarah Palmer; Martin S King; Ann Wiegand; Michael A Polis; JoAnn Mican; Joseph A Kovacs; Richard T Davey; Diane Rock-Kress; Robin Dewar; Shuying Liu; Julia A Metcalf; Catherine Rehm; Scott C Brun; George J Hanna; Dale J Kempf; John M Coffin; John W Mellors Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Parya Saberi; Torsten B Neilands; Eric Vittinghoff; Mallory O Johnson; Margaret Chesney; Susan E Cohn Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Benedict B Hilldorfer; Anthony R Cillo; Guillaume J Besson; Margaret Anne Bedison; John W Mellors Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Xinyan Zhang; Peter W Hunt; Scott M Hammer; Michelle S Cespedes; Kristine B Patterson; Ronald J Bosch Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2013 Mar-Apr
Authors: Chantelle L Ahlenstiel; Kazuo Suzuki; Katherine Marks; Geoff P Symonds; Anthony D Kelleher Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Thomas A Rasmussen; Martin Tolstrup; Anni Winckelmann; Lars Østergaard; Ole S Søgaard Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 3.452