Literature DB >> 21238884

Should we routinely measure portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis, using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as a guide for prophylaxis and therapy of bleeding and rebleeding? No.

Ulrich Thalheimer1, Lia Bellis, Claudio Puoti, Andrew K Burroughs.   

Abstract

Portal hypertension (PH) is a severe complication of liver cirrhosis. Measurement of the degree of portal hypertension is usually performed by measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) which is the difference between the free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) and the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHPG). The HVPG accurately reflects the degree of PH in the majority of liver diseases. PH is defined by an increase of HVPG values above the normal upper limit of 5 mm Hg, while clinically significant PH is defined by an HVPG to ≥10 mm Hg. Although measurement of HVPG potentially has several applications, in clinical practice its major use has been related to the assessment of hemodynamic response to pharmacological therapy, in order to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and to predict the risk of rebleeding from esophageal varices. When properly performed, HVPG is a reliable, safe and good predictive tool in the management of portal hypertension. However, the need for appropriate equipment, sufficient and reliable operators and costs, have discouraged its use outside Liver Units specifically devoted to the clinical management of portal hypertension. This has diminished its applicability. Combining its use with transjugular liver biopsy and using the prognostic value of HVPG may help encourage its use.
Copyright © 2010 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21238884     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  15 in total

1.  EUS-guided portal pressure measurement using a digital pressure wire with real-time remote display: a novel, minimally invasive technique for direct measurement in an animal model.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Christopher C Thompson; Marvin Ryou
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Use of portal pressure studies in the management of variceal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Jennifer Addley; Tony Ck Tham; William Jonathan Cash
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-16

3.  In vivo validation of 4D flow MRI for assessing the hemodynamics of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Alex Frydrychowicz; Eric Niespodzany; Ben R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Effect of temporal resolution on 4D flow MRI in the portal circulation.

Authors:  Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Christopher J Francois; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.

Authors:  Jason Y Huang; Jason B Samarasena; Takeshi Tsujino; John Lee; Ke-Qin Hu; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  EUS-guided intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with direct portal pressure measurements: a novel alternative to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Marvin Ryou; Hiro Aihara; Wasif Abidi; Austin Chiang; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Ayman Sakr; Eduarda Ajeje; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Zubaidah Nor Hanipah; Suriya Punchai; Arthur McCullough; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Stacy A Brethauer; Ali Aminian; Philip R Schauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  The predictive value of baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving secondary prevention.

Authors:  Chuan Liu; Yanna Liu; Ruoyang Shao; Sining Wang; Guangchuan Wang; Lifen Wang; Mingyan Zhang; Jinlin Hou; Chunqing Zhang; Xiaolong Qi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

9.  Noninvasive evaluation of portal hypertension: emerging tools and techniques.

Authors:  V K Snowdon; N Guha; J A Fallowfield
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-07

10.  Correlation of HVPG level with ctp score, MELD Score, ascites, size of varices, and etiology in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Subramaniam Ramanathan; Niranjan Khandelwal; Naveen Kalra; Anmol Bhatia; Radha K Dhiman; Ajay K Duseja; Yogesh K Chawla
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.