Literature DB >> 21238857

Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth.

Bronwen T Taylor1, Peter Fernando, Adrian E Bauman, Anna Williamson, Jonathan C Craig, Sally Redman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximity to public open space, such as parks and other green spaces, has considerable health benefits, and people have been shown to be more likely to use such space for physical activity if it is of high quality. This paper describes a new remote-assessment approach that makes use of Google Earth Pro (the free version of this program is Google Earth) to provide rapid and inexpensive measurement of the quality of public open space.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the correlation between assessments of the quality of public open space using (1) the remote method (making use of Google Earth Pro) and (2) direct observation with a well-established measure of quality, the Public Open Space Tool (POST).
METHODS: Fifty parks selected from the southwest part of Sydney, Australia, were assessed in 2009 with the remote method (using Google Earth Pro), and scores were compared with those obtained from direct observation of the same parks using POST. The time taken to conduct the assessments using each method was also recorded. Raters for each method were blind to scores obtained from using the other method. Analyses were conducted in 2009.
RESULTS: The Spearman correlation coefficient between the quality scores obtained for the 50 parks using the remote method and direct observation was 0.9 (p<0.0001). The remote method took 4 hours, whereas direct observation took 42 hours, showing the remote method to be much faster and more resource efficient for the measurement of the quality of physical activity-related environments.
CONCLUSIONS: The remote-assessment method provides, for the first time, the capacity to assess the quality of large numbers of parks and other green spaces without the need for in-person visits, dramatically reducing the time required for environmental audits of public open space. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21238857     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  33 in total

1.  Assessing Walking and Cycling Environments in the Streets of Madrid: Comparing On-Field and Virtual Audits.

Authors:  Pedro Gullón; Hannah M Badland; Silvia Alfayate; Usama Bilal; Francisco Escobar; Alba Cebrecos; Julia Diez; Manuel Franco
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  The Association Between Park Facilities and Duration of Physical Activity During Active Park Visits.

Authors:  Orion T Stewart; Anne Vernez Moudon; Alyson J Littman; Edmund Seto; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Using Google Street View to audit the built environment: inter-rater reliability results.

Authors:  Cheryl M Kelly; Jeffrey S Wilson; Elizabeth A Baker; Douglas K Miller; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2013-02

4.  Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wilson; Cheryl M Kelly; Mario Schootman; Elizabeth A Baker; Aniruddha Banerjee; Morgan Clennin; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Reliability between online raters with varying familiarities of a region: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).

Authors:  Wenfei Zhu; Yuliang Sun; Jonathan Kurka; Carrie Geremia; Jessa K Engelberg; Kelli Cain; Terry Conway; James F Sallis; Steven P Hooker; Marc A Adams
Journal:  Landsc Urban Plan       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.142

6.  Novel Methods for Environmental Assessment of Pedestrian Injury: Creation and Validation of the Inventory for Pedestrian Safety Infrastructure.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Nesoff; Adam J Milam; Keshia M Pollack; Frank C Curriero; Janice V Bowie; Andrea C Gielen; Debra M Furr-Holden
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  The association between park facilities and the occurrence of physical activity during park visits.

Authors:  Orion Theodore Stewart; Anne Vernez Moudon; Alyson Littman; Edmund Seto; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  J Leis Res       Date:  2019-01-09

8.  Virtual and actual: relative accuracy of on-site and web-based instruments in auditing the environment for physical activity.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Joseph; Jae Seung Lee; Ellen K Cromley; Francine Laden; Philip J Troped
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Racial differences in the built environment--body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods.

Authors:  Dustin T Duncan; Marcia C Castro; Steven L Gortmaker; Jared Aldstadt; Steven J Melly; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children's physical activity?

Authors:  Kate Lachowycz; Andy P Jones; Angie S Page; Benedict W Wheeler; Ashley R Cooper
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.