Literature DB >> 21238327

Biocontrol-risky but necessary?

M B Thomas1, A J Willis.   

Abstract

There is currently much debate concerning the risks of biological control and the potential harmful effects of nonindigenous species introduced for controlling exotic pests. Biocontrol advocates generally appear reluctant to accept the possibility that there could be side-effects associated with biocontrol, often refuting evidence of harmful effects and suggesting that current practices are sufficient to minimize any risks. The biocontrol critics, on the other hand, although eager to provide evidence to the contrary, appear reluctant to propose any detailed, constructive criticisms or workable solutions. Here, we attempt to put these arguments into context, and suggest some directions for future research that might help to resolve some of the problems.

Year:  1998        PMID: 21238327     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01417-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  8 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic arthropods for pest management programs: risks and realities.

Authors:  M A Hoy
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Biological control and sustainable food production.

Authors:  J S Bale; J C van Lenteren; F Bigler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Bacteria isolated from bats inhibit the growth of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the causative agent of white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph R Hoyt; Tina L Cheng; Kate E Langwig; Mallory M Hee; Winifred F Frick; A Marm Kilpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Interactions between the predatory mite Typhlodromalus aripo and the entomopathogenic fungus Neozygites tanajoae and consequences for the suppression of their shared prey/host Mononychellus tanajoa.

Authors:  Bonaventure Vidjannagni Agboton; Rachid Hanna; Alexis Onzo; Stefan Vidal; Andreas von Tiedemann
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Beyond competition: incorporating positive interactions between species to predict ecosystem invasibility.

Authors:  Fabio Bulleri; John F Bruno; Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Augmentative biocontrol in natural marine habitats: persistence, spread and non-target effects of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus.

Authors:  Javier Atalah; Grant A Hopkins; Barrie M Forrest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bio-priming with a hypovirulent phytopathogenic fungus enhances the connection and strength of microbial interaction network in rapeseed.

Authors:  Zheng Qu; Huizhang Zhao; Hongxiang Zhang; Qianqian Wang; Yao Yao; Jiasen Cheng; Yang Lin; Jiatao Xie; Yanping Fu; Daohong Jiang
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 7.290

Review 8.  Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Kelley Leung; Erica Ras; Kim B Ferguson; Simone Ariëns; Dirk Babendreier; Piter Bijma; Kostas Bourtzis; Jacques Brodeur; Margreet A Bruins; Alejandra Centurión; Sophie R Chattington; Milena Chinchilla-Ramírez; Marcel Dicke; Nina E Fatouros; Joel González-Cabrera; Thomas V M Groot; Tim Haye; Markus Knapp; Panagiota Koskinioti; Sophie Le Hesran; Manolis Lyrakis; Angeliki Paspati; Meritxell Pérez-Hedo; Wouter N Plouvier; Christian Schlötterer; Judith M Stahl; Andra Thiel; Alberto Urbaneja; Louis van de Zande; Eveline C Verhulst; Louise E M Vet; Sander Visser; John H Werren; Shuwen Xia; Bas J Zwaan; Sara Magalhães; Leo W Beukeboom; Bart A Pannebakker
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2020-08-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.