Literature DB >> 2123736

Kidney stones and lithotripters: critical analysis of the introduction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy into Canada.

L C Wiser1, R H Plain, J B Dossetor.   

Abstract

It is possible for a nonpharmaceutical medical innovation to enter the mainstream of the health care system without its efficacy and effectiveness having first been established by means of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The result of this omission may be the discreditation and abandonment of the technology or procedure but not before precious resources that could have been better used elsewhere in the health care system are absorbed. A possible example of such a misallocation of resources is the introduction into Canada of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of urolithiasis. We review the development and diffusion of ESWL and recommend ways in which the deficiencies in regulating the introduction of new medical technologies can be corrected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2123736      PMCID: PMC1452933     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  28 in total

Review 1.  Bioeffects of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Strategy for research and treatment.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J A McAteer; S A Kempson; A P Evan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  High-tech medicine and the control of health care costs.

Authors:  C R Stiller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Management of urolithiasis: an analysis of 1,293 lithotriptor procedures.

Authors:  J P Jantzen; K Erdmann; D M Wilbert; H A Hein; A M Klein
Journal:  Tex Med       Date:  1986-12

4.  Conflict of interest eyed at Harvard.

Authors:  W Booth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Kidney changes after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: appearance on MR imaging.

Authors:  B R Baumgartner; K W Dickey; S S Ambrose; K N Walton; R C Nelson; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Radionuclide evaluation pre- and postextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi.

Authors:  J Bomanji; S A Boddy; K E Britton; C C Nimmon; H N Whitfield
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-induced perirenal hematomas.

Authors:  P M Knapp; T B Kulb; J E Lingeman; D M Newman; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Cost analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy relative to other surgical and nonsurgical treatment alternatives for urolithiasis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; R M Saywell; J R Woods; D M Newman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi. One year's experience at a single center.

Authors:  R A Riehle; W R Fair; E D Vaughan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  L J Aronne; R L Braham; R Riehle; E D Vaughan; H S Ruchlin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Necromancing the stones.

Authors:  V Goel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Unexpected difficulties in randomizing patients in a surgical trial: a prospective study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P W Plaisier; M Y Berger; R L van der Hul; H G Nijs; R den Toom; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  How has extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy changed the treatment of urinary stones in Quebec?

Authors:  A R Levy; M McGregor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.