Literature DB >> 21236933

Taxonomic minimalism.

A J Beattle1, I Oliver.   

Abstract

Biological surveys are in increasing demand while taxonomic resources continue to decline. How much formal taxonomy is required to get the job done? The answer depends on the kind of job but it is possible that taxonomic minimalism, especially (1) the use of higher taxonomic ranks, (2) the use of morphospecies rather than species (as identified by Latin binomials), and (3) the involvement of taxonomic specialists only for training and verification, may offer advantages for biodiversity assessment, environmental monitoring and ecological research. As such, formal taxonomy remains central to the process of biological inventory and survey but resources may be allocated more efficiently. For example, if formal Identification is not required, resources may be concentrated on replication and increasing sample sizes. Taxonomic minimalism may also facilitate the inclusion in these activities of important but neglected groups, especially among the invertebrates, and perhaps even microorganisms.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1994        PMID: 21236933     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90320-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  3 in total

1.  A synthesis of variability in nearshore Alaskan marine populations.

Authors:  Ginny L Eckert
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Morphospecies and taxonomic species comparison for Hymenoptera.

Authors:  José G B Derraik; John W Early; Gerard P Closs; Katharine J M Dickinson
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Best Practicable Aggregation of Species: a step forward for species surrogacy in environmental assessment and monitoring.

Authors:  Stanislao Bevilacqua; Joachim Claudet; Antonio Terlizzi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.