Literature DB >> 21236540

Complications in transpalatal distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective clinical study.

Charlotte R A Verlinden1, Peter G Gooris, Alfred G Becking.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transpalatal distraction osteogenesis is a bone-borne technique to expand the maxilla and has become a routine method in treating patients with transverse maxillary hypoplasia. Limited reports concerning treatment difficulties have been published. The purpose of this study was to investigate and categorize the short- and middle-term incidence of peri- and postoperative difficulties (categorized by the classification of Paley in problems, obstacles, and complications). The signs of adverse dental and periodontal effects were established at least 1 year after removal of the distractor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 73 patients (27 male, 46 female; mean age: 28 years; range: 9-59) that underwent bone-borne SARPE in 3 centers were retrospectively investigated. Clinical follow-up was performed in 63 patients after an average period of 23.9 months (range: 6-63 months).
RESULTS: Twenty-seven problems (mainly appliance related), 10 obstacles (appliance-related and asymmetric maxillary expansion), and 1 complication (premature loss of the TPD-module, due to lack of space, in a cleft patient) occurred. Clinical examination showed minimal periodontal damage (gingival recession on 15 sites and pocket depths 4-5 mm in 11 sites). In 28.6% of the incisors radiographic signs of external apical root resorption were seen.
CONCLUSION: Bone-borne SARPE is a reliable technique with predictable outcomes. These results suggest that bone-borne SARPE is associated with a low incidence of dental and periodontal damage. Nevertheless, further research, preferably in randomized controlled design, is needed to evaluate the long-term effects and stability.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21236540     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study.

Authors:  Singaraju Gowri Sankar; Bathini Prashanth; Galli Rajasekhar; Mandava Prasad; Ganugapantae Vivek Reddy; J S Yamini Priyanka
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

2.  Periodontal changes after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME).

Authors:  Thomas Jensen; Lars Hjelm Johannesen; Maria Rodrigo-Domingo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-05-23

3.  Aspergillosis associated with surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Erol Cansiz; Emine Akbas; Sabri Cemil Isler
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

4.  Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol.

Authors:  Heinz Winsauer; Andre Walter; Christos Katsaros; Oliver Ploder
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Does intravenous tranexamic acid reduce blood loss during surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion?

Authors:  Emine Akbas; Zerrin Cebi; Erol Cansiz; Sabri Cemil Isler; Sırmahan Cakarer
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-10-02

6.  Evaluation of symmetry behavior of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with simulation-driven targeted bone weakening.

Authors:  S Chhatwani; K Schudlich; S C Möhlhenrich; A Pugachev; A Bicsak; B Ludwig; S Hassfeld; G Danesh; L Bonitz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.