Literature DB >> 21236212

Entomological and mammalogical perspectives on genital differentiation.

R Edwards1.   

Abstract

When hypotheses concerning the evolution of animal genitalia are classified by their assumptions and arranged historically, key differences between the entomological and mammalogical approaches become clear. The former tradition emphasizes mechanism and the latter emphasizes species isolation. Consequently, studies of this subject often address different aspects of the question while using similar terminology, specifically, the term 'lock-and-hey'. Because genital variation represents a significant portion of animal diversity, it merits the attention and clarity of investigation given to other anatomical features. However, attempts to achieve the necessary level of clarity have been largely unsuccessful. This article promotes common terms for improved communication between researchers.
Copyright © 1993. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1993        PMID: 21236212     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90042-N

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  3 in total

1.  Condition dependence of phenotypic integration and the evolvability of genitalic traits in a neriid fly.

Authors:  Zachariah Wylde; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Coevolution of male and female reproductive structures in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dominique Joly; Michele Schiffer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Evolution of the elaborate male intromittent organ of Xiphophorus fishes.

Authors:  Julia C Jones; Carmelo Fruciano; Anja Keller; Manfred Schartl; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.