Literature DB >> 21235685

Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.

R Sweis1, M Fox, A Anggiansah, T Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based esophageal pH-monitoring is used to evaluate patients with suspected gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however false-negative results may occur due to poor tolerance of the catheter with reduced oral intake and activity, or high day-to-day variation in reflux and symptom events. We assessed diagnostic yield and clinical impact of prolonged, wireless pH-monitoring in patients with negative results from 24-h catheter-based studies and ongoing symptoms.
METHODS: Esophageal acid exposure (percentage time pH <4), Symptom Index, and Symptom Association Probability (SAP) were calculated. Diagnostic yield was assessed using Average (mean) and Worst Day (24-h period with highest acid exposure or symptom load) analyses. Outcome data were assessed 6-36 months (median 24) after initiation of definitive therapy based on physiologic testing. KEY
RESULTS: Data from prolonged pH-monitoring up to 96-h (median 72-h) were available from 38 patients. Using Average and Worst Day analysis, esophageal acid exposure was pathologic in 37% and 47%, whereas SAP was positive in 34% and 63% of patients, respectively. Overall using Average and Worst Day analyses, 61% and 76% patients were diagnosed with GERD based on either pathologic acid exposure or positive symptom association. Of 12 patients that underwent antireflux surgery, 10(83%) reported a good outcome at a median 24 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Prolonged, wireless pH-monitoring increases test sensitivity and diagnostic yield in patients with continuing esophageal symptoms despite negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies. Without a definitive diagnosis, many would not have received effective treatment.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21235685     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  23 in total

1.  Trajectory assessment is useful when day-to-day esophageal acid exposure varies in prolonged wireless pH monitoring.

Authors:  R Yadlapati; J D Ciolino; J Craft; S Roman; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  The role of oesophageal physiological testing in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Hasak; Rena Yadlapati; Osama Altayar; Rami Sweis; Emily Tucker; Kevin Knowles; Mark Fox; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Medical conditions and erosive tooth wear.

Authors:  R Moazzez; R Austin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  [Modern diagnostic tools for esophageal pathologies].

Authors:  A Kandulski; P Malfertheiner; J Weigt
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  The value of early wireless esophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing functional heartburn in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Eun-Young Park; Myung-Gyu Choi; Meonggi Baeg; Chul-Hyun Lim; Jinsu Kim; Yukyung Cho; Jaemyung Park; Inseok Lee; Sangwoo Kim; Kyuyong Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  BRAVO esophageal pH monitoring: more cost-effective than empiric medical therapy for suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Cheguevara Afaneh; Veronica Zoghbi; Brendan M Finnerty; Anna Aronova; David Kleiman; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl Crawford; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Advances in motility testing--current and novel approaches.

Authors:  Albert J Bredenoord; André J P M Smout
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Yield of prolonged wireless pH monitoring in achalasia patients successfully treated with pneumatic dilation.

Authors:  Aurelio Mauro; Marianna Franchina; Alessandra Elvevi; Delia Pugliese; Andrea Tenca; Dario Conte; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 10.  Functional esophageal disorders: pharmacological options.

Authors:  Gehanjali Amarasinghe; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.