Literature DB >> 21235390

Why do different EQA schemes have apparently different limits of acceptability?

Bedrich Friedecky, Josef Kratochvila, Marek Budina.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21235390     DOI： 10.1515/CCLM.2011.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN： 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  LEGO plot for simultaneous application of multiple quality requirements during trueness verification of quantitative laboratory tests.

Authors:  Hae-il Park; Hyojin Chae; Myungshin Kim; Jehoon Lee; Yonggoo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Disregarded Measurement Uncertainty Contributions and Their Magnitude in Measuring Plasma Glucose.

Authors:  Astrid Petersmann; Rainer Macdonald; Matthias Nauck
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Lack of grading agreement among international hemostasis external quality assessment programs.

Authors:  John D Olson; Ian Jennings; Piet Meijer; Chantal Bon; Roslyn Bonar; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Russell A Higgins; Michael Keeney; Joy Mammen; Richard A Marlar; Roland Meley; Sukesh C Nair; William L Nichols; Anne Raby; Joan C Reverter; Alok Srivastava; Isobel Walker
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.276

4.  Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches: Electronic supplementary material available online for this article.

Authors:  Xiuzhi Guo; Tianjiao Zhang; Xuehui Gao; Pengchang Li; Tingting You; Qiong Wu; Jie Wu; Fang Zhao; Liangyu Xia; Ermu Xu; Ling Qiu; Xinqi Cheng
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 5.  Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.

Authors:  Sten Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use.

Authors:  Yong Xia; Hao Xue; Cunliang Yan; Bowen Li; ShuQiong Zhang; Mingyang Li; Ling Ji
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Comparative analysis of calculating sigma metrics by a trueness verification proficiency testing-based approach and an internal quality control data inter-laboratory comparison-based approach.

Authors:  Runqing Li; Tengjiao Wang; Lijun Gong; Peng Peng; Song Yang; Haibin Zhao; Pan Xiong
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Application of Sigma metrics in the quality control strategies of immunology and protein analytes.

Authors:  Yanfen Luo; Xingxing Yan; Qian Xiao; Yifei Long; Jieying Pu; Qiwei Li; Yimei Cai; Yushun Chen; Hongyuan Zhang; Cha Chen; Songbang Ou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.352
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.