Literature DB >> 21235359

Advanced diagnostics in renal mass using optical coherence tomography: a preliminary report.

Kurdo Barwari1, Daniel M de Bruin, Evelyne C C Cauberg, Dirk J Faber, Ton G van Leeuwen, Hessel Wijkstra, Jean de la Rosette, M Pilar Laguna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To avoid unnecessary surgical treatment of small renal masses (≤ 4 cm), a more accurate diagnostic method would be desirable since radiological differentiation between malignant and benign is difficult and nondiagnostic biopsies account from 9% to 37%. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures backscattered light versus depth, with an attenuation coefficient (μ(t)) that may vary among different histological types. We hypothesize that quantitative measurements of μ(t) using OCT can differentiate between normal renal parenchyma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both normal and tumor renal tissues (RCC) were harvested after partial or radical nephrectomy. Analysis of μ(t) was based on difference of (1) μ(t) between normal and tumor tissue across all patients and (2) μ(t) between normal and tumor tissue within individual patients.
RESULTS: Tissue samples of 18 patients were measured, of which 4 were excluded (urothelial carcinoma, oncocytoma, and benign lesion without normal tissue available). Of the remaining 14 patients, 8 contributed with both normal and RCC tissue and 6 with only normal or RCC tissue. Independent observation showed a significant difference between the median μ(t) of normal renal tissue (4.95 mm⁻¹) and the median μ(t) of RCC (8.86 mm⁻¹). No statistically significant difference was found when comparing the difference in μ(t) between normal renal parenchyma and RCC within individual patients.
CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in μ(t) between normal and RCC tissue across all patients. These results overpower the lack of significant difference within individuals, encouraging further research and suggesting a possible role for OCT in the diagnostic work-up of renal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21235359     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  20 in total

1.  Validation of quantitative attenuation and backscattering coefficient measurements by optical coherence tomography in the concentration-dependent and multiple scattering regime.

Authors:  Mitra Almasian; Nienke Bosschaart; Ton G van Leeuwen; Dirk J Faber
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Measuring the optical characteristics of medulloblastoma with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Barry Vuong; Patryk Skowron; Tim-Rasmus Kiehl; Matthew Kyan; Livia Garzia; Cuiru Sun; Michael D Taylor; Victor X D Yang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  In vivo, percutaneous, needle based, optical coherence tomography of renal masses.

Authors:  Peter G Wagstaff; Abel Swaan; Alexandre Ingels; Patricia J Zondervan; Otto M van Delden; Dirk J Faber; Ton G van Leeuwen; Jean J de la Rosette; Daniel M de Bruin; M Pilar Laguna Pes
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Analysis of attenuation coefficient estimation in Fourier-domain OCT of semi-infinite media.

Authors:  Babak Ghafaryasl; Koenraad A Vermeer; Jeroen Kalkman; Tom Callewaert; Johannes F de Boer; Lucas J Van Vliet
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Determination of confocal profile and curved focal plane for OCT mapping of the attenuation coefficient.

Authors:  Sabina Stefan; Ki-Soo Jeong; Collin Polucha; Nikos Tapinos; Steven A Toms; Jonghwan Lee
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Quantitative optical coherence tomography of fluid-filled oral mucosal lesions.

Authors:  O K Adegun; P H Tomlins; E Hagi-Pavli; D L Bader; Farida Fortune
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  K A Vermeer; J Mo; J J A Weda; H G Lemij; J F de Boer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 8.  Current and evolving uses of optical coherence tomography in the genitourinary tract.

Authors:  Mohit Gupta; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Integrated optical coherence tomography and optical coherence microscopy imaging of ex vivo human renal tissues.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Chao Zhou; David W Cohen; Amy E Mondelblatt; Yihong Wang; Aaron D Aguirre; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; James G Fujimoto; James L Connolly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Optical coherence tomography and computer-aided diagnosis of a murine model of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Bohan Wang; Hsing-Wen Wang; Hengchang Guo; Erik Anderson; Qinggong Tang; Tongtong Wu; Reuben Falola; Tikina Smith; Peter M Andrews; Yu Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.