Literature DB >> 21234672

Effect of adding gefitinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor negative early breast cancer in a randomized phase II trial.

Mogens Bernsdorf1, Christian Ingvar, Leif Jörgensen, Malgorzata K Tuxen, Erik H Jakobsen, Anna Saetersdal, Marie Louise Kimper-Karl, Niels Kroman, Eva Balslev, Bent Ejlertsen.   

Abstract

Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown both anti-proliferative and anti-tumoral activity in breast cancer. This study was designed to determine the effect of adding gefitinib to neoadjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) on tumor response rates. Women with unilateral, primary operable, estrogen receptor negative invasive breast cancer ≥ 2 cm were eligible for inclusion. Randomized patients were to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant EC plus 12 weeks of either gefitinib (250 mg daily) or placebo. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints were complete response (CR) and overall objective response (OR). 181 patients were randomized. A pCR was observed in 17% (12/71) of patients treated with gefitinib and in 12% (9/73) of patients treated with placebo (4.57% difference, 95% CI -7.19 to 6.33; P = 0.44). CR was observed in 10% of patients in both the gefitinib (7/71) and the placebo group (7/73) (0.27% difference, 95% CI -9.6 to 10.2; P = 0.96). There was no significant difference in OR (5.96%; 95% CI -9.9 to 21.9; P = 0.45) between the two groups. Post hoc subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in pCR between triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC tumors (P = 0.03). More patients in the gefitinib arm had hematological toxicity (P = 0.15) and discontinued treatment (9/94 vs. 2/86) because of adverse events (AE). Tumor response rates were similar in the two groups. A significantly higher pCR rate was observed post hoc in TNBC versus non-TNBC independent of treatment. More patients in the gefitinib group discontinued treatment because of AE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21234672     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1352-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  23 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Katsuya Nakai; Mien-Chie Hung; Hirohito Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in breast cancer (Review).

Authors:  George Iancu; Dragos Serban; Cristinel Dumitru Badiu; Ciprian Tanasescu; Mihai Silviu Tudosie; Corneliu Tudor; Daniel Ovidiu Costea; Anca Zgura; Raluca Iancu; Danut Vasile
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  The ixabepilone and vandetanib combination shows synergistic activity in docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Stanton Tam; Yassir Al-Zubaidi; Md Khalilur Rahman; Kirsi Bourget; Fanfan Zhou; Michael Murray
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Grape polyphenols inhibit Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and potentiate the effects of gefitinib in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linette Castillo-Pichardo; Suranganie F Dharmawardhane
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.900

5.  Profiles of Basal and stimulated receptor signaling networks predict drug response in breast cancer lines.

Authors:  Mario Niepel; Marc Hafner; Emily A Pace; Mirra Chung; Diana H Chai; Lili Zhou; Birgit Schoeberl; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 6.  Potentiating Therapeutic Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kyu Sic You; Yong Weon Yi; Jeonghee Cho; Jeong-Soo Park; Yeon-Sun Seong
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

7.  Pathological complete response in younger and older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kołacińska; Justyna Chałubińska; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Izabela Dowgier-Witczak; Wojciech Fendler; Radzisław Kordek; Zbigniew Morawiec
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 8.  Curcumin and Resveratrol as Promising Natural Remedies with Nanomedicine Approach for the Effective Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Amol Shindikar; Akshita Singh; Malcolm Nobre; Saurabh Kirolikar
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 9.  Triple-negative breast cancer: promising prognostic biomarkers currently in development.

Authors:  Jasmine Sukumar; Kelly Gast; Dionisia Quiroga; Maryam Lustberg; Nicole Williams
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.512

10.  Meta-analysis on the association between pathologic complete response and triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kunpeng Wu; Qiaozhu Yang; Yi Liu; Aibing Wu; Zhixiong Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.