Literature DB >> 21234585

Comparative evaluation of anatomical and functional outcomes using brilliant blue G versus triamcinolone assisted ILM peeling in macular hole surgery in Indian population.

Atul Kumar1, Varun Gogia, Vinit M Shah, Tapas C Nag.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare anatomical and functional outcomes using brilliant blue G (BBG) vs triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-assisted ILM peeling in macular hole surgery (MHS). STUDY
DESIGN: Simple, comparative, retrospective, non-randomised, interventional single-centre study.
METHODS: Ninety-four eyes of 94 patients with idiopathic macular holes (≥ stage 2) who underwent MHS at our centre were included. Patients with failed macular holes, post-traumatic macular holes, history of previous vitreoretinal surgery, high myopia (6 dioptres or more) or any other macular pathology potentially limiting visual acuity, such as diabetic retinopathy or age-related macular degeneration, were excluded. An OCT evaluation of hole status was followed by pars plana vitrectomy for each of these eyes. Those who underwent TA-assisted ILM peeling were considered as group 1 and those with BBG-assisted ILM peeling were considered as group 2. Primary outcome measures included anatomical hole closure and functional success in terms of change in visual acuity of ≥2 LogMAR lines. Various preoperative factors were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Anatomical hole closure was achieved in 85 eyes (90.43%) and visual gain in 78 eyes (82.9%). Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 16.14 ± 1.95 months. No significant difference was found in anatomical and functional success between the two groups. Group 1 had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative glaucoma. Duration of symptoms of <12 months (p = 0.004) and preoperative visual acuity ≤1.0 LogMAR were related to anatomical success. However, greater visual gain was found in patients with chronic holes (≥12 months) (p = 0.046) and poor preoperative visual acuity (>1.0 LogMAR) (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: BBG-assisted ILM peeling offers an effective alternative to triamcinolone, with the added advantage of marked enhancement of vitreoretinal interface contrast with comparable hole closure rates and visual outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21234585     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1609-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  50 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of macular holes and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  William E Smiddy; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Chromovitrectomy: a new field in vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Eduardo B Rodrigues; Carsten H Meyer; Peter Kroll
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Triamcinolone-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Naoichi Horio; Masayuki Horiguchi; Naoki Yamamoto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Triamcinolone-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Gaurav K Shah; Brett J Rosenblatt; Kevin J Blinder; M Gilbert Grand; Morton Smith
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Ultrastructural features of tissue removed during idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  H S Yooh; H L Brooks; A Capone; N L L'Hernault; H E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Christos Haritoglou; Carolin A Gass; Markus Schaumberger; Arnd Gandorfer; Michael W Ulbig; Anselm Kampik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  [Surgical management of complete macular foramina].

Authors:  O Liesenhoff; E M Messmer; A Pulur; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Residual triamcinolone acetonide at macular hole after vitreous surgery.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Subijay Sinha; Anoop Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Pars plana vitrectomy for treatment of stage 2 macular holes.

Authors:  A J Ruby; D F Williams; M G Grand; M A Thomas; T A Meredith; I Boniuk; R J Olk
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-03

10.  Indocyanine green enhanced maculorhexis in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Gunjan Prakash; Rajender P Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  16 in total

1.  Critical involvement of extracellular ATP acting on P2RX7 purinergic receptors in photoreceptor cell death.

Authors:  Shoji Notomi; Toshio Hisatomi; Takaaki Kanemaru; Atsunobu Takeda; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Hiroshi Enaida; Guido Kroemer; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  On the safety profile of Ocublue Plus (BBG 0.05%).

Authors:  D Shukla; J Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Internal limiting membrane peeling with different dyes in the surgery of idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review of literature and network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Ran You; Min Li; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Efficacy of different doses of dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Min Li; Ran You; Hui-Hui Wang; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Chromovitrectomy: update.

Authors:  Ali M Al-Halafi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-17

6.  A preliminary study of Heavy Brilliant Blue G for internal limiting membrane staining in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Dhananjay Shukla; Jay Kalliath; Aditi Patwardhan; Naresh B Kannan; Soubhya B Thayyil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Lynn L Huang; David H Levinson; Jonathan P Levine; Umar Mian; Irena Tsui
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Evaluation of predictors for anatomical success in macular hole surgery in Indian population.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Varun Gogia; Prakhar Kumar; Srivats Sehra; Shikha Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Refractory full thickness macular hole: current surgical management.

Authors:  Rino Frisina; Irene Gius; Luigi Tozzi; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.456

10.  Hyperautofluorescent ring in eyes with macular holes.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Sato; Kazuyuki Emi; Yui Osawa; Hajime Bando
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.