Literature DB >> 21233045

Optimizing Case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography.

Maurice Samulski1, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

When reading mammograms, radiologists combine information from multiple views to detect abnormalities. Most computer-aided detection (CAD) systems, however, use primitive methods for inclusion of multiview context or analyze each view independently. In previous research it was found that in mammography lesion-based detection performance of CAD systems can be improved when correspondences between MLO and CC views are taken into account. However, detection at case level detection did not improve. In this paper, we propose a new learning method for multiview CAD systems, which is aimed at optimizing case-based detection performance. The method builds on a single-view lesion detection system and a correspondence classifier. The latter provides class probabilities for the various types of region pairs and correspondence features. The correspondence classifier output is used to bias the selection of training patterns for a multiview CAD system. In this way training can be forced to focus on optimization of case-based detection performance. The method is applied to the problem of detecting malignant masses and architectural distortions. Experiments involve 454 mammograms consisting of four views with a malignant region visible in at least one of the views. To evaluate performance, five-fold cross validation and FROC analysis was performed. Bootstrapping was used for statistical analysis. A significant increase of case-based detection performance was found when the proposed method was used. Mean sensitivity increased by 4.7% in the range of 0.01-0.5 false positives per image.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21233045     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2105886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  6 in total

1.  Retrieval boosted computer-aided diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hao Jing; Yongyi Yang; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses.

Authors:  Rianne Hupse; Maurice Samulski; Marc Lobbes; Ard den Heeten; Mechli W Imhof-Tas; David Beijerinck; Ruud Pijnappel; Carla Boetes; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Predicting Malignancy from Mammography Findings and Surgical Biopsies.

Authors:  Pedro Ferreira; Nuno A Fonseca; Inês Dutra; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed)       Date:  2011-11

5.  Predicting malignancy from mammography findings and image-guided core biopsies.

Authors:  Pedro Ferreira; Nuno A Fonseca; Inês Dutra; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  Int J Data Min Bioinform       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.667

6.  Classification of Breast Cancer Images by Implementing Improved DCNN with Artificial Fish School Model.

Authors:  M Thilagaraj; N Arunkumar; Petchinathan Govindan
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.