Literature DB >> 21232718

Influence of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with the paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent: results of the "TAXUS Woman" analysis.

Ghada W Mikhail1, Robert T Gerber, David A Cox, Stephen G Ellis, John M Lasala, John A Ormiston, Gregg W Stone, Mark A Turco, Anita A Joshi, Donald S Baim, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We conducted the "TAXUS Woman" analysis to assess the influence of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in a broad spectrum of patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that the sex gap suggesting worse outcomes in women has narrowed. However, limited data are available on long-term sex-based outcomes with drug-eluting stents despite their extensive use in current practice.
METHODS: We analyzed 2,271 PES-treated patients (women = 665), from 5 randomized trials and 7,492 PES-treated patients (women = 2,449) from 2 "real-world" registries. The trial and registry datasets were stratified by sex to compare long-term outcomes. Additionally, the outcomes in PES-treated women were compared with bare-metal stent-treated women (n = 395) in the randomized trials.
RESULTS: In the randomized trials, PES-treated women had a lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate (11.5% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001) than bare-metal stent-treated women, with no significant sex-based differences in death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or TLR through 5 years. In both the trials and the registries, although women had more adverse baseline characteristics including advanced age, hypertension, and diabetes, they had similar outcomes to men. In expanded-use patients, however, women showed significantly higher rates of death and TLR, although only the higher TLR rate was confirmed by multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of nearly 10,000 patients including more than 3,000 women demonstrates that despite their higher-risk profile, women have comparable benefits to men from percutaneous coronary intervention with PES except for a slightly higher revascularization rate in the high-risk cohort.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21232718     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coronary revascularization in women.

Authors:  Gina Lundberg; Spencer King
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Sex differences in clinical outcomes after rotational atherectomy of calcified coronary stenoses: from multicenter registry.

Authors:  Hisao Otsuki; Kentaro Jujo; Kazuki Tanaka; Iwao Okai; Makoto Nakashima; Tomotaka Dohi; Shinya Okazaki; Ryuta Okabe; Fukuko Nagura; Yugo Nara; Hideyuki Kawashima; Hiroyuki Kyono; Hiroyuki Arashi; Junichi Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Tamura; Takeshi Kurata; Katsumi Miyauchi; Ken Kozuma; Hiroyuki Daida; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Sex-related differences in fractional flow reserve-guided treatment.

Authors:  Jing Li; Charanjit S Rihal; Yoshiki Matsuo; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Moo-Sik Lee; Andrew Cassar; Ryan J Lennon; Joerg Herrmann; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Qi Hua; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 4.  Sex-Specific Outcomes in Cardiovascular Device Evaluations.

Authors:  Mohammed Imran Ghare; Daniela Tirziu; Jinnette Dawn Abbott; Elissa Altin; Yiping Yang; Vivian Ng; Cindy Grines; Alexandra Lansky
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Gender differences in risk profile and outcome of Middle Eastern patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mohamad I Jarrah; Ayman J Hammoudeh; Dalal B Al-Natour; Yousef S Khader; Ramzi A Tabbalat; Imad A Alhaddad; Susan M Kullab
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 6.  Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women: Are There Differences When Compared with Men?

Authors:  Usha Rao; G Louise Buchanan; Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21

7.  Sex differences in the outcomes of stent implantation in mini-swine model.

Authors:  Mie Kunio; Gee Wong; Peter M Markham; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Deferred Revascularization Following Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: International Collaboration Registry of Comprehensive Physiologic Evaluation.

Authors:  Masahiro Hoshino; Rikuta Hamaya; Yoshihisa Kanaji; Yoshinori Kanno; Masahiro Hada; Masao Yamaguchi; Yohei Sumino; Hidenori Hirano; Tomoki Horie; Eisuke Usui; Tomoyo Sugiyama; Tadashi Murai; Tetsumin Lee; Taishi Yonetsu; Joo Myung Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Doyeon Hwang; Jonghanne Park; Ji-Hyun Jung; Hyung Yoon Kim; Hae Won Jung; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Seung-Ho Hur; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Francesco Lauri; Sonoka Goto; Fernando Macaya; Angela McInerney; Giacomo Gravina; Rafael Vera; Nieves Gonzalo; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Ivan Nuñez-Gil; Pablo Salinas; Luis Nombela-Franco; Maria Del Trigo; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Carlos Macaya; Bon-Kwon Koo; Javier Escaned; Tsunekazu Kakuta
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.