Literature DB >> 21232464

Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: Genetic coupling and genetic correlations.

C R Boake1.   

Abstract

The parallel evolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals has been a topic of research in both neuroethology and evolutionary quantitative genetics. Neuroethologists have debated whether the same physiological mechanism underlies both production and reception of a signal, and whether the same genes affect the physiology of communication in each sex. Quantitative geneticists have discussed the possibility that particular types of signals, and preferences for those types, are inherited together. Studies of communication by a variety of insect species do not provide strong support for a common physiological mechanism, but do not rule out the genetic effect. The neuroethological perspective may be of assistance in understanding the evolution of sexual communication because it offers a way to subdivide communication into units for genetic analysis.
Copyright © 1991. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1991        PMID: 21232464     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90027-U

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  17 in total

1.  Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. II. Localization of temperature effects on song production and recognition networks in Gryllus firmus.

Authors:  A Pires; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.

Authors:  Chris Wiley; Christopher K Ellison; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The consequences of regulation of desat1 expression for pheromone emission and detection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Benjamin Houot; François Bousquet; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Behavioral coupling in tettigoniid hybrids (Orthoptera).

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 5.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation.

Authors:  Kerry L Shaw; Sky C Lesnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Male territorial vocalizations and responses are decoupled in an avian hybrid zone.

Authors:  Paula M den Hartog; Hans Slabbekoorn; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Expression of a desaturase gene, desat1, in neural and nonneural tissues separately affects perception and emission of sex pheromones in Drosophila.

Authors:  François Bousquet; Tetsuya Nojima; Benjamin Houot; Isabelle Chauvel; Sylvie Chaudy; Stéphane Dupas; Daisuke Yamamoto; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation.

Authors:  Mingzi Xu; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Female song preference and the period gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  M L Greenacre; M G Ritchie; B C Byrne; C P Kyriacou
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.