BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite growing evidence that inhibition of α6β2-containing (α6β2*) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) may be beneficial for the therapy of tobacco addiction, the lack of good sources of α6β2*-nAChRs has delayed the discovery of α6β2-selective antagonists. Our aim was to generate a cell line stably expressing functional nAChRs with α6β2 properties, to enable pharmacological characterization and the identification of novel α6β2-selective antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Different combinations of the α6, β2, β3, chimeric α6/3 and mutant β3(V273S) subunits were transfected in human embryonic kidney cells and tested for activity in a fluorescent imaging plate reader assay. The pharmacology of rat immune-immobilized α6β2*-nAChRs was determined with ¹²⁵I-epibatidine binding. KEY RESULTS: Functional channels were detected after co-transfection of α6/3, β2 and β3(V273S) subunits, while all other subunit combinations failed to produce agonist-induced responses. Stably expressed α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChR pharmacology was unique, and clearly distinct from α4β2-, α3β4-, α7- and α1β1δε-nAChRs. Antagonist potencies in inhibiting α6/3β2β3(V273S) -nAChRs was similar to their binding affinity for rat native α6β2*-nAChRs. Agonist affinities for α6β2*-nAChRs was higher than their potency in activating α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChRs, but their relative activities were equivalent. Focussed set screening at α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChRs, followed by cross-screening with the other nAChRs, led to the identification of novel α6β2-selective antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We generated a mammalian cell line stably expressing nAChRs, with pharmacological properties similar to native α6β2*-nAChRs, and used it to identify novel non-peptide, low molecular weight, α6β2-selective antagonists. We also propose a pharmacophore model of α6β2 antagonists, which offers a starting point for the development of new smoking cessation agents.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite growing evidence that inhibition of α6β2-containing (α6β2*) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) may be beneficial for the therapy of tobacco addiction, the lack of good sources of α6β2*-nAChRs has delayed the discovery of α6β2-selective antagonists. Our aim was to generate a cell line stably expressing functional nAChRs with α6β2 properties, to enable pharmacological characterization and the identification of novel α6β2-selective antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Different combinations of the α6, β2, β3, chimeric α6/3 and mutant β3(V273S) subunits were transfected in humanembryonic kidney cells and tested for activity in a fluorescent imaging plate reader assay. The pharmacology of rat immune-immobilized α6β2*-nAChRs was determined with ¹²⁵I-epibatidine binding. KEY RESULTS: Functional channels were detected after co-transfection of α6/3, β2 and β3(V273S) subunits, while all other subunit combinations failed to produce agonist-induced responses. Stably expressed α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChR pharmacology was unique, and clearly distinct from α4β2-, α3β4-, α7- and α1β1δε-nAChRs. Antagonist potencies in inhibiting α6/3β2β3(V273S) -nAChRs was similar to their binding affinity for rat native α6β2*-nAChRs. Agonist affinities for α6β2*-nAChRs was higher than their potency in activating α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChRs, but their relative activities were equivalent. Focussed set screening at α6/3β2β3(V273S)-nAChRs, followed by cross-screening with the other nAChRs, led to the identification of novel α6β2-selective antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We generated a mammalian cell line stably expressing nAChRs, with pharmacological properties similar to native α6β2*-nAChRs, and used it to identify novel non-peptide, low molecular weight, α6β2-selective antagonists. We also propose a pharmacophore model of α6β2 antagonists, which offers a starting point for the development of new smoking cessation agents.
Authors: Steven Broadbent; Paul J Groot-Kormelink; Paraskevi A Krashia; Patricia C Harkness; Neil S Millar; Marco Beato; Lucia G Sivilotti Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: C A Briggs; D J Anderson; J D Brioni; J J Buccafusco; M J Buckley; J E Campbell; M W Decker; D Donnelly-Roberts; R L Elliott; M Gopalakrishnan; M W Holladay; Y H Hui; W J Jackson; D J Kim; K C Marsh; A O'Neill; M A Prendergast; K B Ryther; J P Sullivan; S P Arneric Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 1997 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Sharon R Grady; Outi Salminen; Duncan C Laverty; Paul Whiteaker; J Michael McIntosh; Allan C Collins; Michael J Marks Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2007-07-27 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: J Michael McIntosh; Layla Azam; Sarah Staheli; Cheryl Dowell; Jon M Lindstrom; Alexander Kuryatov; James E Garrett; Michael J Marks; Paul Whiteaker Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Glenn E Kirsch; Nikolai B Fedorov; Yuri A Kuryshev; Zhiqi Liu; Lucas C Armstrong; Michael S Orr Journal: Assay Drug Dev Technol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.738