Literature DB >> 21231841

Midwife-led care unit for 'low risk' pregnant women in a Japanese hospital.

Shunji Suzuki1, Yoshie Hiraizumi, Misao Satomi, Hidehiko Miyake.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the obstetric outcomes of our 'low risk' pregnant women under the midwife-led delivery care compared with those under the obstetric shared care.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of labor under midwife 'primary' care with those under obstetric shared care. The factors examined were: maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, length of labor, augmentation of labor pains, delivery mode, episiotomy, perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal birth weight, Apgar score, and umbilical artery pH. In this study, pregnant women were initially considered 'low risk' at admission when they had no history of medical, gynecological, or obstetric problems and no complications during the present pregnancy.
RESULTS: There were 1031 pregnant women initially considered 'low risk' at admission. At admission, 878 of them (85%) requested to give birth under midwife care; however 364 of these women (42%) were transferred to obstetric shared care during labor. The average length of labor under the midwife 'primary' care was significantly longer than that under the obstetric shared care. However, there were no significant differences in the rate of prolonged labor (≥24  h). There were no significant differences in other obstetric or neonatal outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence indicating that midwife 'primary' care is unsafe for 'low risk' pregnant women. Therefore, midwifery care is recommended for 'low risk' pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21231841     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.545912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  7 in total

1.  Trend analysis of primary midwife-led delivery care at a Japanese perinatal center.

Authors:  Shunji Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Audit of a new model of birth care for women with low risk pregnancies in South Africa: the primary care onsite midwife-led birth unit (OMBU).

Authors:  George Justus Hofmeyr; Thozeka Mancotywa; Nomvula Silwana-Kwadjo; Batembu Mgudlwa; Theresa A Lawrie; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Emma R Allanson; Jennifer Pontre; Özge Tunçalp; George Justus Hofmeyr; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-09-02

4.  Recent Clinical Characteristics of Labors Using Three Japanese Systems of Midwife-Led Primary Delivery Care.

Authors:  Shunji Suzuki
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  A Comparison of Midwife-Led and Medical-Led Models of Care and Their Relationship to Adverse Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Zealand.

Authors:  Ellie Wernham; Jason Gurney; James Stanley; Lis Ellison-Loschmann; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Midwife Led Units: Transforming Maternity Care Globally.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Juliana Ivanof; Ursula Kafulafula
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.462

Review 7.  Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.

Authors:  Sanam Roder-DeWan; Kojo Nimako; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Archana Amatya; Ana Langer; Margaret Kruk
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.