Literature DB >> 21231796

Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology.

Thor Knak Jensen1, Per Holt, Oke Gerke, Morten Riehmann, Birgitte Svolgaard, Niels Marcussen, Kirsten Bouchelouche.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The treatment and prognosis of bladder cancer are based on the depth of primary tumour invasion and the presence of metastases. A highly accurate preoperative tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) staging is critical to proper patient management and treatment. This study retrospectively investigated the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative N staging of bladder cancer. Material and methods. From June 2006 to January 2008, 48 consecutive patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were referred to preoperative staging including MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Eighteen out of 48 patients underwent radical cystoprostatectomy including removal of lymph nodes for histology, and were included in the study. Values of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for regional N staging were compared to histopathology findings, the gold standard. Results. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI were performed in 18 patients. The specificities for detection of lymph-node metastases for MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 80% (n = 15) and 93.33% (n = 15), respectively. The negative predictive values were 80% (n = 15) and 87.5% (n = 16) for MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. The differences in specificity and negative predictive values were not statistically significant. Conclusions. No significant statistical difference between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for preoperative N staging of urothelial bladder cancer was found in the study. However, the trend of the data indicates an advantage of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT over MRI. Larger prospective studies are needed to elucidate the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in N staging of bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21231796     DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2010.544672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  20 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Imaging for Clinical Staging Prior to Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Vinay Duddalwar; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Comparing RECIST with EORTC criteria in metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Diagnostic value of [18F] FDG-PET and PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huojun Zhang; Wei Xing; Qinqin Kang; Chao Chen; Linhui Wang; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-26

4.  Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Crozier; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Brian Ngo; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Update on use of enhanced imaging to optimize lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for urothelial cancer of the bladder.

Authors:  Lukas Lusuardi; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Increasing use of positron emission tomography among medicare beneficiaries undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Avinash Maganty; Robert M Turner; Jonathan G Yabes; Dwight E Heron; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy: does lymphadenectomy have an impact on the clinical outcome?

Authors:  Nessn H Azawi; Kasper Drimer Berg; Andreas Key Milan Thamsborg; Claus Dahl; Jan Viberg Jepsen; Bjarne Kroman-Andersen; Johan Poulsen; Helle Handler Petersen; L Henning Olsen; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  [Functional imaging in bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Maurer; T Horn; A J Beer; M Eiber; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  PET/CT and MRI in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  J Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2012-07-30

10.  Application of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in diagnosing bladder tumor metastasis lesions.

Authors:  Yang Li; Zhong-Qing Yang; Hui Ye; Lin Qi; Jun-Wu Hu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.