Literature DB >> 21231781

Screening for cancer-related distress: Summary of evidence from tools to programmes.

Pernille Envold Bidstrup1, Christoffer Johansen, Alex J Mitchell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A number of studies have addressed the development and testing of tools for measuring cancer-related distress. Except for studies of diagnostic validity, knowledge on the effect of screening for psychological distress on psychological well-being is limited. We aimed to describe and critically discuss the findings of randomized trials of the effect of screening and to identify components necessary for future studies of the effectiveness of screening programmes.
METHODS: A search was made of the Embase/Medline and Web of Knowledge abstract databases from inception to September 2010. Our inclusion criterion was randomized controlled trials concerning the effect of screening for psychological distress on psychological outcomes. We compared the randomized trials on the following aspects: design and methods, setting and sample, screening and intervention, effects on psychological distress, staff utilization of screening results, possible confounding factors and other methodological limitations.
RESULTS: Of the seven identified randomized trials of the effect of screening for psychological distress, three showed an effect on psychological well-being, one showed an effect only among patients depressed at baseline, and three studies showed no effect. Several of the trials had methodological weaknesses and they were heterogeneous in design and content making direct comparisons difficult. DISCUSSION: Future randomized trials are needed to examine comparative validity of different screening approaches and to evaluate the benefits of screening linked with associated treatment. Trials should include distress as a patient outcome, use appropriate samples, include a detailed, theory-based distress management plan, offer staff training and ideally track staff and patient use of subsequent interventions. Provisional work suggests that screening for psychological distress holds promise and is often clinically valuable, but it is too early to conclude definitively that psychological screening itself affects the psychological well-being of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21231781     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.533192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  21 in total

1.  Using Screening for Distress, the sixth vital sign, to advance patient care with assessment and targeted interventions.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Sheila N Garland; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Risk factors for cancer-related distress in colorectal cancer survivors: one year post surgery.

Authors:  Claire J Han; Biljana Gigic; Martin Schneider; Yakup Kulu; Anita R Peoples; Jennifer Ose; Torsten Kölsch; Paul B Jacobsen; Graham A Colditz; Jane C Figueiredo; William M Grady; Christopher I Li; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Adetunji T Toriola; Alexis B Ulrich; Karen L Syrjala; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Quantifying psychological distress among cancer patients in interventions and scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Yeh; Yu-Chu Chung; Man-Ying F Hsu; Chin-Che Hsu
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-03

4.  Scan-associated distress in lung cancer: Quantifying the impact of "scanxiety".

Authors:  Joshua M Bauml; Andrea Troxel; C Neill Epperson; Roger B Cohen; Kathryn Schmitz; Carrie Stricker; Lawrence N Shulman; Angela Bradbury; Jun J Mao; Corey J Langer
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Gaps in the Management of Depression Symptoms Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Laura E Davis; Elie Isenberg-Grzeda; Alyson L Mahar; Haoyu Zhao; Victoria Zuk; Lesley Moody; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-26

6.  Risk factors for current and future unmet supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Vanessa L Beesley; Leesa F Wockner; Peter O'Rourke; Monika Janda; David Goldstein; Helen Gooden; Neil D Merrett; Dianne L O'Connell; Ingrid J Rowlands; David K Wyld; Rachel E Neale
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Family caregivers' distress levels related to quality of life, burden, and preparedness.

Authors:  Rebecca Fujinami; Virginia Sun; Finly Zachariah; Gwen Uman; Marcia Grant; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Management of Cancer Related Distress in Patients with a Hematological Malignancy.

Authors:  Tara A Albrecht; Margaret Rosenzweig
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.918

9.  Brief Distress Screening in Clinical Practice: Does it Help to Effectively Allocate Psycho-Oncological Support to Female Cancer Inpatients?

Authors:  Kerstin Hermelink; Henrik Höhn; Stephan Hasmüller; Julia Gallwas; Kristin Härtl; Rachel Würstlein; Janna Köhm
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Meijer; Michelle Roseman; Vanessa C Delisle; Katherine Milette; Brooke Levis; Achyuth Syamchandra; Michael E Stefanek; Donna E Stewart; Peter de Jonge; James C Coyne; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.