| Literature DB >> 21229229 |
Kaworu Ebana1, Taeko Shibaya, Jianzhong Wu, Kazuki Matsubara, Hiroyuki Kanamori, Hiroko Yamane, Utako Yamanouchi, Tatsumi Mizubayashi, Izumi Kono, Ayahiko Shomura, Sachie Ito, Tsuyu Ando, Kiyosumi Hori, Takashi Matsumoto, Masahiro Yano.
Abstract
To dissect the genetic factors controlling naturally occurring variation of heading date in Asian rice cultivars, we performed QTL analyses using F(2) populations derived from crosses between a japonica cultivar, Koshihikari, and each of 12 cultivars originating from various regions in Asia. These 12 diverse cultivars varied in heading date under natural field conditions in Tsukuba, Japan. Transgressive segregation was observed in 10 F(2) combinations. QTL analyses using multiple crosses revealed a comprehensive series of loci involved in natural variation in flowering time. One to four QTLs were detected in each cross combination, and some QTLs were shared among combinations. The chromosomal locations of these QTLs corresponded well with those detected in other studies. The allelic effects of the QTLs varied among the cross combinations. Sequence analysis of several previously cloned genes controlling heading date, including Hd1, Hd3a, Hd6, RFT1, and Ghd7, identified several functional polymorphisms, indicating that allelic variation at these loci probably contributes to variation in heading date. Taken together, the QTL and sequencing results indicate that a large portion of the phenotypic variation in heading date in Asian rice cultivars could be generated by combinations of different alleles (possibly both loss- and gain-of-function) of the QTLs detected in this study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21229229 PMCID: PMC3057013 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-010-1524-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Appl Genet ISSN: 0040-5752 Impact factor: 5.699
Geographical origin and heading date of rice accessions used in this study
| Accessiona | Abbreviations | Origin | Cultivar groupb | Days-to-headingc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koshihikari | KSH | Japan | A | 109 ± 0.9 |
| Qiu Zhao Zong | QZZ | China | C | 91 ± 1.4 |
| Tupa 121-3 | TUP | Bangladesh | B | 102 ± 1.1 |
| Muha | MUH | India | B | 106 ± 1.9 |
| Davao1 | DAV | Philippines | C | 111 ± 1.1 |
| Toboshi | TOB | Japan | C | 112 ± 1.3 |
| Basilanon | BAS | Philippines | B | 115 ± 2.0 |
| Deng Pao Zhai | DPZ | China | C | 122 ± 1.8 |
| Khau Mac Kho | KMK | Vietnam | A | 124 ± 1.2 |
| Bei Khe | BKH | Cambodia | C | 125 ± 2.6 |
| Naba | NAB | India | C | 127 ± 1.6 |
| Khao Nam Jen | KNJ | Laos | A | 186 ± 3.4 |
| Bleiyo | BLE | Thailand | C | 191 ± 1.5 |
aAll accessions were selected from world rice collections (WRC) (Kojima et al. 2005)
bCultivar group is based on the classification system of Kojima et al. (2005). Groups A, B, and C, correspond to japonica, Aus, and indica, respectively
cDays to heading was scored at the Experimental Field of National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan (36°N). Days to heading is shown as mean ± SD
Fig. 1Frequency distributions of days to heading (DTH) in F2 populations derived from crosses between Koshihikari and 12 diverse Asian cultivars. DTH was scored at the Experimental Field of National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan (36°N). Arrows show the mean DTH in the parental lines. Parental lines are denoted by the abbreviations given in Table 1
Heading date QTLs detected in 12 F2 populations derived from crosses between Koshihikari and Asian rice cultivars
| Population | Marker type | Chr | Nearest marker | Physical position of QTL (Mbp) | LODa | Additive effectb | Dominance effectc | PVE (%)d | QTLe | IMf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QZZ | SSR | 7 | RM3670 | 14.94 | 19.40 | 9.73 | 9.42 | 43.32 |
| |
| 7 | RM5720 | 29.33 | 4.19 | 5.66 | 1.56 | 8.53 |
| n.d | ||
| 8 | RM5556 | 4.59 | 8.82 | 8.24 | 4.18 | 19.29 |
| |||
| TUP | SSR | 2 | RM3789_1 | 34.77 | 4.35 | −4.12 | −0.33 | 2.95 |
| n.d. |
| 3 | RM5801 | 33.57 | 11.85 | −7.83 | 1.02 | 9.40 |
| n.d. | ||
| 6 | Hd1 | 9.96 | 41.65 | 19.37 | 4.52 | 70.21 |
| |||
| 8 | RM5432 | 4.07 | 7.67 | −6.10 | 0.72 | 5.89 |
| n.d. | ||
| MUH | SNP | 3 | P1220 | 2.08 | 4.28 | 2.41 | 7.78 | 4.54 |
| n.d. |
| 3 | P1710_1 | 34.28 | 6.72 | −7.30 | 1.32 | 9.33 |
| |||
| 6 | RM3431 | 8.64 | 28.55 | 19.06 | 7.01 | 63.87 |
| |||
| 7 | P0388 | 28.22 | 4.12 | −4.60 | 5.72 | 4.79 |
| n.d. | ||
| DAV | SNP | 6 | AH06000195 | 3.05 | 6.34 | −9.00 | −6.32 | 16.98 |
| n.d. |
| 6 | P0013 | 8.32 | 8.75 | 9.39 | 5.99 | 19.06 |
| |||
| 8 | RM5556 | 4.59 | 12.12 | 12.12 | 5.54 | 28.96 |
| |||
| TOB | SNP | 6 | RM3805 | 2.79 | 8.21 | −10.69 | −7.68 | 14.29 |
| |
| 8 | RM3374 | 3.75 | 28.83 | 23.24 | 12.97 | 59.88 |
| |||
| BAS | SSR | 3 | Hd6 | 32.37 | 8.38 | −5.14 | 7.21 | 12.59 |
| n.d. |
| 6 | RM6836-1 | 9.31 | 24.71 | 14.67 | 4.40 | 58.33 |
| |||
| DPZ | SNP | 8 | RM5556 | 4.59 | 17.12 | 22.18 | 17.25 | 53.62 |
| |
| KMK | SSR | 2 | RM450 | 30.61 | 6.87 | −6.92 | −1.69 | 9.31 |
| n.d. |
| 3 | RM3867 | 32.79 | 14.02 | −9.85 | 0.21 | 22.36 |
| |||
| 6 | RM3431A | 8.72 | 17.94 | 12.34 | −0.54 | 33.14 |
| |||
| BKH | SSR | 6 | RM3805 | 2.85 | 7.54 | −13.59 | −13.06 | 11.64 |
| |
| 8 | RM5556 | 5.41 | 23.45 | 23.51 | 21.37 | 42.01 |
| |||
| NAB | SSR | 3 | RM6970 | 33.60 | 8.49 | −9.15 | 3.78 | 9.52 |
| |
| 6 | Hd1 | 9.33 | 30.90 | 19.93 | 10.90 | 43.25 |
| |||
| 7 | RM5436 | 9.11 | 6.24 | −7.90 | 4.50 | 6.13 |
| n.d. | ||
| 8 | RM3791 | 4.52 | 9.48 | −9.01 | 4.06 | 10.32 |
| |||
| KNJ | SSR | 3 | RM6970 | 33.71 | 21.37 | −13.16 | 4.44 | 54.11 |
| |
| 6 | RM3431A | 8.74 | 12.36 | −8.90 | 4.31 | 22.18 |
| |||
| BLE | SSR | 2 | RM3316 | 32.31 | 4.55 | −5.49 | −0.41 | 9.56 |
| n.d. |
| 3 | RM6970 | 32.99 | 5.51 | −4.87 | 4.50 | 9.70 |
| |||
| 6 | RM3805 | 3.19 | 14.53 | −9.49 | −6.11 | 28.13 |
| |||
| 7 | RM1362_2 | 29.91 | 9.34 | −7.88 | −1.01 | 18.23 |
|
All genetic parameters were calculated by Composit Interval mapping function (CIM) in QTL Cartographer ver. 2.5 (Basten et al. 2005)
SSR simple sequence repeat, SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism
aLog-likelihood value
bAdditive effect of Koshihikari allele on days-to-heading
cDominance effect of Koshihikari allele
dPercent of phenotypic variance explained by QTL. LOD threshold to detect QTLs was determined in each F2 population (Figure S1)
ePreviously identified QTL(s) corresponding with the QTLs detected in this study based on their physical positions
fResults of Interval Maping (IM) analysis. QTLs not detected in IM analysis are indicated by n.d.
Fig. 2Chromosomal locations of QTLs detected in 12 F2 populations. Most likely QTL positions detected in each population (Table 2) are shown by arrowheads; confidence intervals (2-LOD reduction on each side) are indicated by bars extending from the arrowheads. Cultivar abbreviations are as shown in Table 1. The direction of additive effect of the Koshihikari (KSH) allele at each QTL detected is shown by a white (earlier heading) or black (later heading) arrowhead. Physical positions of Hd6 (Takahashi et al. 2001), Hd1 (Yano et al. 2000), Hd3a (Kojima et al. 2002), RFT1 (Kojima et al. 2002), and Ghd7 (Xue et al. 2008) are shown by horizontal bars. The positions of Hd7 (Yamamoto et al. 2000), Hd9 (Lin et al. 2002), Hd16 (Matsubara et al. 2008a), Hd2 (Yamamoto et al. 1998, 2000) and Hd5 (Lin et al. 2003) are shown as boxes defined by the positions of flanking markers
Fig. 3Substitutions (boxed) and indels (-) of amino acids observed in heading date genes Hd1, RFT1, and Ghd7. The known domains within each gene are indicated as light-colored regions with labels above them. Numbers under the gene bars indicate sites of sequence changes; numbers on the right show the total length of each predicted amino acid sequence. The regions with amino acid changes due to frameshifts are labeled with an asterisk. Stop stop codon