Literature DB >> 21228711

Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work.

Jeffrey C Schneider1, Sharon Bassi, Colleen M Ryan.   

Abstract

This study compares employment rates and barriers to return to work in subjects burned at work with those burned outside of work. Further, this study examines the influence of electrical etiology on return to work outcomes. The electronic records of burn survivors treated at a Regional Burn Center outpatient clinic from 2001 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included employment at the time of burn injury and age of 18 years or older. Demographic and medical data were collected. Documentation of barriers to return to work was reviewed and classified into eight categories. Return to employment was grouped into four time intervals: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 12, and greater than 12 months after injury. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of unemployment at greater than 1 year for subjects burned at work, outside of work, and those burned at work without electric injury. The authors identified 197 patients for inclusion in the study. Their age was 37 ± 0.8 years (mean ± SEM), and TBSA burned was 16 ± 1%. Fifty percent of subjects were burned at work. Electric etiology was seen only in those burned at work (n = 24). Forty-four percent (n = 43) of subjects injured at work remained unemployed at 1 year compared with 22% (n = 22) of subjects injured outside of work. The most frequent employment barriers included pain (72%), neurologic problems (62%), and psychiatric problems (53%) for those burned at work; and pain (63%), neurologic problems (59%), and impaired mobility (54%) for those burned outside of work. Significant predictors of unemployment at greater than 12 months included burn at work, pain, impaired mobility, other medical problems, and inpatient rehabilitation (P < .05). When the electrical injury subjects are removed from the analysis, significant predictors of unemployment at 12 months include burn at work, pain, inpatient rehabilitation, and length of stay (P < .05). Burn survivors experience multiple complex barriers in returning to work. Burn at work is a significant predictor of unemployment at 1 year even after controlling for electric etiology. Further study is required to better understand the influence of work setting on employment outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228711     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaf56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  13 in total

1.  Psychological morbidity and return to work after injury: multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Denise Kendrick; Paula Dhiman; Blerina Kellezi; Carol Coupland; Jessica Whitehead; Kate Beckett; Nicola Christie; Judith Sleney; Jo Barnes; Stephen Joseph; Richard Morriss
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Validation of the Community Integration Questionnaire in the adult burn injury population.

Authors:  Paul Gerrard; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Vivian L Shie; Radha Holavanahalli; Austin Lee; Alan Jette; James A Fauerbach; Peter Esselman; David Herndon; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Guidelines for vocational evaluation following burns: integrated review of relevant process and factors.

Authors:  Mary Stergiou-Kita; Alisa Grigorovich
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

4.  Occupational burns treated in emergency departments.

Authors:  Audrey A Reichard; Srinivas Konda; Larry L Jackson
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Using digital phenotyping to characterize psychosocial trajectories for people with burn injury.

Authors:  Huan Deng; Cailin A Abouzeid; Lauren J Shepler; Mary D Slavin; J Andrew Taylor; Hannah W Mercier; Juan P Herrera-Escobar; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  Work-related burn injuries in Ontario, Canada: A follow-up 10-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Elsa Clouatre; Manuel Gomez; Joanne M Banfield; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  The impact of electrical injuries on long-term outcomes: A Burn Model System National Database study.

Authors:  O R Stockly; A E Wolfe; L F Espinoza; L C Simko; K Kowalske; G J Carrougher; N Gibran; A M Bamer; W Meyer; M Rosenberg; L Rosenberg; L E Kazis; C M Ryan; J C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile Study.

Authors:  Cayla J Saret; Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.819

9.  Impact of Work-Related Burn Injury on Social Reintegration Outcomes: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Schneider; Vivian L Shie; Leda F Espinoza; Gabriel D Shapiro; Austin Lee; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Alan Jette; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  The impact of discharge contracture on return to work after burn injury: A Burn Model System investigation.

Authors:  Tam N Pham; Richard Goldstein; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran; Jeremy Goverman; Peter C Esselman; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.