Literature DB >> 21228072

Large-scale deployment of the Global Trigger Tool across a large hospital system: refinements for the characterisation of adverse events to support patient safety learning opportunities.

V S Good1, M Saldaña, R Gilder, D Nicewander, D A Kennerly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement encourages use of the Global Trigger Tool to objectively determine and monitor adverse events (AEs).
SETTING: Baylor Health Care System (BHCS) is an integrated healthcare delivery system in North Texas. The Global Trigger Tool was applied to BHCS's eight general acute care hospitals, two inpatient cardiovascular hospitals and two rehabilitation/long-term acute care hospitals. STRATEGY: Data were collected from a monthly random sample of charts for each facility for patients discharged between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007 by external professional nurse auditors using an MS Access Tool developed for this initiative. In addition to the data elements recommended by Institute for Healthcare Improvement, BHCS developed fields to permit further characterisation of AEs to identify learning opportunities. A structured narrative description of each identified AE facilitated text mining to further characterise AEs. INITIAL
FINDINGS: Based on this sample, AE rates were found to be 68.1 per 1000 patient days, or 50.8 per 100 encounters, and 39.8% of admissions were found to have ≥1 AE. Of all AEs identified, 61.2% were hospital-acquired, 10.1% of which were associated with a National Coordinating Council - Medical Error Reporting and Prevention harm score of "H or I" (near death or death). FUTURE DIRECTION: To enhance learning opportunities and guide quality improvement, BHCS collected data-such as preventability and AE source-to characterise the nature of AEs. Data are provided regularly to hospital teams to direct quality initiatives, moving from a general focus on reducing AEs to more specific programmes based on patterns of harm and preventability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228072     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2008.029181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  17 in total

1.  Development of an Adverse Event Surveillance Model for Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Kamal M F Itani; Steven D Pizer; Martin P Charns; Peter E Rivard; Nathalie McIntosh; Mary T Hawn; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Identifying Previously Undetected Harm: Piloting the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Global Trigger Tool in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Caitlin W Brennan; Tiffany Folkes; John Hermos; Jeffrey Chan; Amy K Rosen; Steven R Simon
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.926

Review 3.  Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features.

Authors:  Yang Gong; Hong Kang; Xinshuo Wu; Lei Hua
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Characterization of adverse events detected in a large health care delivery system using an enhanced global trigger tool over a five-year interval.

Authors:  Donald A Kennerly; Rustam Kudyakov; Briget da Graca; Margaret Saldaña; Jan Compton; David Nicewander; Richard Gilder
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Are measurements of patient safety culture and adverse events valid and reliable? Results from a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Per G Farup
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? an evaluation of the "Harvard Medical Practice Study" method and the "Global Trigger Tool".

Authors:  Maria Unbeck; Kristina Schildmeijer; Peter Henriksson; Urban Jürgensen; Olav Muren; Lena Nilsson; Karin Pukk Härenstam
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-04-15

7.  Strengths and weaknesses of working with the Global Trigger Tool method for retrospective record review: focus group interviews with team members.

Authors:  Kristina Schildmeijer; Lena Nilsson; Joep Perk; Kristofer Arestedt; Gunilla Nilsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Hematology point of care testing and laboratory errors: an example of multidisciplinary management at a children's hospital in northeast Italy.

Authors:  Sergio Parco; Patrizia Visconti; Fulvia Vascotto
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-01-16

9.  Characterisations of adverse events detected in a university hospital: a 4-year study using the Global Trigger Tool method.

Authors:  Hans Rutberg; Madeleine Borgstedt Risberg; Rune Sjödahl; Pernilla Nordqvist; Lars Valter; Lena Nilsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Does increasing the size of bi-weekly samples of records influence results when using the Global Trigger Tool? An observational study of retrospective record reviews of two different sample sizes.

Authors:  Kjersti Mevik; Frances A Griffin; Tonje E Hansen; Ellen T Deilkås; Barthold Vonen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.