Literature DB >> 21227939

Management of fertility preservation in prepubertal patients: 5 years' experience at the Catholic University of Louvain.

C Wyns1, M Curaba, S Petit, B Vanabelle, P Laurent, J-F X Wese, J Donnez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Since prepubertal boys cannot benefit from sperm banking, a potential alternative strategy for fertility preservation involves immature testicular tissue (ITT) banking aimed at preservation of spermatogonial stem cells. Survival of spermatogonia has been demonstrated after ITT freezing, which is considered ethically acceptable. We report the results of a pilot program set up for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. METHODS All boys undergoing ITT cryobanking from May 2005 were identified from our clinical register. Data were collected from medical files. RESULTS Testicular tissue was retrieved from 52 prepubertal patients under 12 years of age and 10 peripubertal patients aged between 12 and 16 years, in whom no spermatozoa were identified in testicular biopsies. Malignant disease accounted for 80.6% of cases; the remaining patients suffered from benign disorders requiring gonadotoxic treatments. Mean ages, Tanner stages and occurrence rates of urogenital pathology were 6.43 ± 3.32 and 14 ± 1.23 years, I and I-IV, and 13.5 and 20% for pre- and peripubertal patients, respectively. Mean volumes of removed tissue were 20.1 ± 8.6 and 42.4 ± 15.6 mm(3) for pre- and peripubertal patients, respectively. No complications occurred during or after tissue retrieval and 93.5% of referred patients accepted ITT storage. The presence of spermatogonia, and thus the potential for later tissue use, was established in all of these patients. CONCLUSIONS The majority of cryopreserved samples showed reproductive potential. Storage was accepted by most parents. All parents and children considered this fertility preservation strategy a positive approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227939     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  40 in total

1.  Fruitful progress to fertility: male fertility in the test tube.

Authors:  Amander T Clark; Bart T Phillips; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Fertility preservation options in transgender people: A review.

Authors:  Natnita Mattawanon; Jessica B Spencer; David A Schirmer; Vin Tangpricha
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation and Ethical Considerations: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Angel Petropanagos
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 4.  Male Fertility Preservation.

Authors:  J Abram McBride; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Spermatogonial Stem Cell Culture in Oncofertility.

Authors:  Sherin David; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 6.  Adult somatic cells to the rescue: nuclear reprogramming and the dispensability of gonadal germ cells.

Authors:  Charles A Easley; David R Latov; Calvin R Simerly; Gerald Schatten
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Fertility preservation strategies for male patients with cancer.

Authors:  Darren J Katz; Thomas F Kolon; Darren R Feldman; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.

Authors:  Samir N Babayev; Erol Arslan; Stanley Kogan; Fred Moy; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Experimental methods to preserve male fertility and treat male factor infertility.

Authors:  Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Does prepubertal testicular tissue vitrification influence spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) viability?

Authors:  Mohammadreza Gholami; Masoud Hemadi; Ghasem Saki; Abolfazl Zendedel; Ali Khodadadi; Javad Mohammadi-Asl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.