Literature DB >> 21227793

Is predator-prey coevolutlon an arms race?

P A Abrams1.   

Abstract

Biologists have often used simple analogies to help them think about complex processes in evolution. The mutual evolution of predator and prey has often been conceived of as an arms race. An increase in the armaments of one contestant in the race simply causes the other contestant to increase armaments in response. This analogy implies that the evolution in the predator population of improved abilities to capture prey should result in an evolutionary response in the prey that improves its abilities to avoid capture. Conversely, the evolution of improved escape abilities should result in increased capture abilities. The general applicability of this arms race analogy has not been supported by mathematical models of predatorprey interactions.
Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1986        PMID: 21227793     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(86)90037-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  6 in total

1.  Changes of traits in a bacterial population associated with protozoal predation.

Authors:  S Shikano; L S Luckinbill; Y Kurihara
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective.

Authors:  P Marrow; U Dieckmann; R Law
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Adaptive evolution of the venom-targeted vWF protein in opossums that eat pitvipers.

Authors:  Sharon A Jansa; Robert S Voss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ancestrally Reconstructed von Willebrand Factor Reveals Evidence for Trench Warfare Coevolution between Opossums and Pit Vipers.

Authors:  Danielle H Drabeck; Alexandra Rucavado; Erika Hingst-Zaher; Antony Dean; Sharon A Jansa
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 8.800

5.  Bank vole alarm pheromone chemistry and effects in the field.

Authors:  Thorbjörn Sievert; Hannu Ylönen; James D Blande; Amélie Saunier; Dave van der Hulst; Olga Ylönen; Marko Haapakoski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Foraging, feeding, and physiological stress responses of wild wood mice to increased illumination and common genet cues.

Authors:  Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Isabel Barja; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.624

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.