Literature DB >> 21227485

Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation.

Chun-Li Lin1, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Che-An Pai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the risk of failure for an endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation and three CEREC ceramic restoration configurations.
METHODS: Simulations were performed based on three 3D finite element (FE) models designed with CEREC ceramic inlay, endocrown and conventional crown restorations. Long-term failure probability in relation to varying load conditions was calculated by incorporating the Weibull function in FE analysis. Additionally, the final fracture strength and corresponding load value of the first acoustic emission (AE) activity in each specimen was recorded by performing in vitro AE analysis in CEREC restored teeth compressive testing.
RESULTS: Simulation results indicated that the stress values on the enamel, dentin and luting cement for endocrown restorations were the lowest ones among the corresponding values for inlay and conventional crown restorations. Weibull analysis indicated that failure probability was 95%, 2% and 2% for the inlay, endocrown and conventional crown restorations, respectively, for normal biting. AE analysis revealed that, although the significantly least load was required for the first AE activity for inlay configuration, the endocrown and conventional crowns did not significantly differ from each other. SIGNIFICANCE: This in vitro study, i.e. numerical and AE analyses, suggest that endocrown and conventional crown restorations for endodontically treated premolars with MOD preparation present a similar longevity.
Copyright © 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227485     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  10 in total

1.  The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading.

Authors:  Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Carlo Massimo Saratti; Antoine Poncet; Albert J Feilzer; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  The fracture strength of endocrowns manufactured from different hybrid blocks under axial and lateral forces.

Authors:  Duygu Hazal Acar; Elif Kalyoncuoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of stress distribution between zirconia/alloy endocrown and CAD/CAM multi-piece zirconia post-crown: three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxue Yang; Fei Han; Chen Chen; Haifeng Xie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Restoration of endodontically treated molars using all ceramic endocrowns.

Authors:  Roopak Bose Carlos; Mohan Thomas Nainan; Shamina Pradhan; Shiny Benjamin; Rajani Rose
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-12-22

5.  Biomechanical interactions of endodontically treated tooth implant-supported prosthesis under fatigue test with acoustic emission monitoring.

Authors:  Shao-Fu Huang; Wan-Rung Chen; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 6.  Endocrowns: review.

Authors:  Gaye Sevimli; Seda Cengiz; M Selcuk Oruc
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-04-29

7.  Comparison of resistance to fracture between three types of permanent restorations subjected to shear force: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramin Atash; Maiyas Arab; Hadrien Duterme; Sibel Cetik
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Finite element and in vitro study on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct or indirect composite restorations.

Authors:  Tatjana Maravić; Allegra Comba; Claudia Mazzitelli; Luca Bartoletti; Irene Balla; Elisabetta di Pietro; Uroš Josić; Luigi Generali; Darko Vasiljević; Larisa Blažić; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Fracture resistance of bonded ceramic overlay restorations prepared in various designs.

Authors:  Wilasinee Channarong; Nuttakarn Lohawiboonkij; Pitsinee Jaleyasuthumkul; Kittipong Ketpan; Nut Duangrattanaprathip; Kornchanok Wayakanon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Examination of ceramic restoration adhesive coverage in cusp-replacement premolar using acoustic emission under fatigue testing.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Jin-Jie Yu; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.