Literature DB >> 21227483

Does long term use of piracetam improve speech disturbances due to ischemic cerebrovascular diseases?

Levent Güngör1, Murat Terzi, Musa Kazim Onar.   

Abstract

Aphasia causes significant disability and handicap among stroke survivors. Language therapy is recommended for aphasic patients, but not always available. Piracetam, an old drug with novel properties, has been shown to have mild beneficial effects on post-stroke aphasia. In the current study, we investigated the effects of 6 months treatment with piracetam on aphasia following stroke. Thirty patients with first-ever ischemic strokes and related aphasia were enrolled in the study. The scores for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Gülhane Aphasia Test were recorded. The patients were scheduled randomly to receive either 4.8 g piracetam daily or placebo treatment for 6 months. At the end of 24 weeks, clinical assessments and aphasia tests were repeated. The level of improvement in the clinical parameters and aphasia scores was compared between the two groups. All patients had large lesions and severe aphasia. No significant difference was observed between the piracetam and placebo groups regarding the improvements in the NIHSS, BI and mRS scores at the end of the treatment. The improvements observed in spontaneous speech, reading fluency, auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, repetition, and naming were not significantly different in the piracetam and placebo groups, the difference reached significance only for auditory comprehension in favor of piracetam at the end of the treatment. Piracetam is well-tolerated in patients with post-stroke aphasia. Piracetam taken orally in a daily dose of 4.8 g for 6 months has no clear beneficial effect on post-stroke language disorders.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227483     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Central Nervous System Drugs on Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  See-Hwee Yeo; Zheng-Jie Ian Lim; Jia Mao; Wai-Ping Yau
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Piracetam for Aphasia in Post-stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Ruili Wei; Zhongqin Chen; Benyan Luo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Psycholinguistics of Aphasia Pharmacotherapy: Asking the Right Questions.

Authors:  Dalia Cahana-Amitay; Martin L Albert; Abigail Oveis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 4.  Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Guadalupe Dávila; Natalia García Casares; Antonio Gutiérrez
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 6.  Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Chiara Picano; Agnese Quadrini; Francesca Pisano; Paola Marangolo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-02

7.  Diagnosing Weber syndrome requires compliance with diagnostic criteria and compatibility with cerebral imaging.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer; Fulvio A Scorza
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.