BACKGROUND: The presence and extent of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. Few studies have evaluated interactions or independent incremental risk for coronary and thoracic aortic calcification (TAC). The independent predictive value of TAC for CHD events is not well-established. METHODS: This study used risk factor and computed tomography scan data from 6807 participants in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Using the same images for each participant, TAC and CAC were each computed using the Agatston method. The study subjects were free of incident CHD at entry into the study. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population (n=6807) was 62±10 years (47% males). At baseline, the prevalence of TAC and CAC was 28% (1904/6809) and 50% (3393/6809), respectively. Over 4.5±0.9 years, a total of 232 participants (3.41%) had CHD events, of which 132 (1.94%) had a hard event (myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death). There was a significant interaction between gender and TAC for CHD events (p<0.05). Specifically, in women, the risk of all CHD event was nearly 3-fold greater among those with any TAC (hazard ratio: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.60-5.76). After further adjustment for increasing CAC score, this risk was attenuated but remained robust (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.10-4.17). Conversely, there was no significant association between TAC and incident CHD in men. In women, the likelihood ratio chi square statistics indicate that the addition of TAC contributed significantly to predicting incident CHD event above that provided by traditional risk factors alone (chi square=12.44, p=0.0004) as well as risk factors+CAC scores (chi square=5.33, p=0.02). On the other hand, addition of TAC only contributed in the prediction of hard CHD events to traditional risk factors (chi-square=4.33, p=0.04) in women, without contributing to the model containing both risk factors and CAC scores (chi square=1.55, p=0.21). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that TAC is a significant predictor of future coronary events only in women, independent of CAC. On studies obtained for either cardiac or lung applications, determination of TAC may provide modest supplementary prognostic information in women with no extra cost or radiation.
BACKGROUND: The presence and extent of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. Few studies have evaluated interactions or independent incremental risk for coronary and thoracic aortic calcification (TAC). The independent predictive value of TAC for CHD events is not well-established. METHODS: This study used risk factor and computed tomography scan data from 6807 participants in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Using the same images for each participant, TAC and CAC were each computed using the Agatston method. The study subjects were free of incident CHD at entry into the study. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population (n=6807) was 62±10 years (47% males). At baseline, the prevalence of TAC and CAC was 28% (1904/6809) and 50% (3393/6809), respectively. Over 4.5±0.9 years, a total of 232 participants (3.41%) had CHD events, of which 132 (1.94%) had a hard event (myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death). There was a significant interaction between gender and TAC for CHD events (p<0.05). Specifically, in women, the risk of all CHD event was nearly 3-fold greater among those with any TAC (hazard ratio: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.60-5.76). After further adjustment for increasing CAC score, this risk was attenuated but remained robust (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.10-4.17). Conversely, there was no significant association between TAC and incident CHD in men. In women, the likelihood ratio chi square statistics indicate that the addition of TAC contributed significantly to predicting incident CHD event above that provided by traditional risk factors alone (chi square=12.44, p=0.0004) as well as risk factors+CAC scores (chi square=5.33, p=0.02). On the other hand, addition of TAC only contributed in the prediction of hard CHD events to traditional risk factors (chi-square=4.33, p=0.04) in women, without contributing to the model containing both risk factors and CAC scores (chi square=1.55, p=0.21). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that TAC is a significant predictor of future coronary events only in women, independent of CAC. On studies obtained for either cardiac or lung applications, determination of TAC may provide modest supplementary prognostic information in women with no extra cost or radiation.
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Roger S Blumenthal; J Jeffrey Carr; Jonathan G Goldin; Philip Greenland; Alan D Guerci; Joao A C Lima; Daniel J Rader; Geoffrey D Rubin; Leslee J Shaw; Susan E Wiegers Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Jeffrey Carr; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Nathan D Wong; Michael McNitt-Gray; Yadon Arad; David R Jacobs; Stephan Sidney; Diane E Bild; O Dale Williams; Robert C Detrano Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Junichiro Takasu; Ronit Katz; Songshou Mao; David M Shavelle; Kevin D O'Brien; Roger S Blumenthal; J Jeffrey Carr; Richard Kronmal Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: N Rodondi; B C Taylor; D C Bauer; L-Y Lui; M T Vogt; H A Fink; W S Browner; S R Cummings; K E Ensrud Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: H C Stary; A B Chandler; R E Dinsmore; V Fuster; S Glagov; W Insull; M E Rosenfeld; C J Schwartz; W D Wagner; R W Wissler Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sila Kurugol; Carolyn E Come; Alejandro A Diaz; James C Ross; Greg L Kinney; Jennifer L Black-Shinn; John E Hokanson; Matthew J Budoff; George R Washko; Raul San Jose Estepar Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Isac C Thomas; Caroline A Thompson; Mingan Yang; Matthew A Allison; Nketi I Forbang; Erin D Michos; Robyn L McClelland; Matthew J Budoff; Michael H Criqui Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Leila R Zelnick; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pamela L Lutsey; Gregory Burke; Erin D Michos; Steven J C Shea; Russell Tracy; David S Siscovick; Bruce Psaty; Bryan Kestenbaum; Ian H de Boer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Caleb E Finch; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff; Hillard Kaplan; Michael D Gurven Journal: Elife Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Angelica Ezeigwe; Oluwaseun E Fashanu; Di Zhao; Matthew J Budoff; James D Otvos; Isac C Thomas; Samia Mora; Martin Tibuakuu; Erin D Michos Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Isac C Thomas; Robyn L McClelland; Erin D Michos; Matthew A Allison; Nketi I Forbang; W T Longstreth; Wendy S Post; Nathan D Wong; Matthew J Budoff; Michael H Criqui Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Michael H Criqui; Victor Aboyans; Matthew A Allison; Julie O Denenberg; Nketi Forbang; Mary M McDermott; Christina L Wassel; Nathan D Wong Journal: Glob Heart Date: 2016-09
Authors: Oluwaseun E Fashanu; Anas Bizanti; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Di Zhao; Matthew J Budoff; Isac C Thomas; W T Longstreth; Erin D Michos Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2020-07-05 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Michael H Criqui; Julie O Denenberg; Robyn L McClelland; Matthew A Allison; Joachim H Ix; Alan Guerci; Kevin P Cohoon; Preethi Srikanthan; Karol E Watson; Nathan D Wong Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Junichiro Takasu; Matthew J Budoff; Ronit Katz; Juan J Rivera; Kevin D O'Brien; David M Shavelle; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Daniel O'Leary; Khurram Nasir Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 5.162