Literature DB >> 21227182

Sex change and the size-advantage model.

R R Warner1.   

Abstract

At the intraspecific level, the size-advantage model attempts to explain why some species change sex and others do not. Generally, sex change is favored if the relation between reproductive success and size or age differ between the sexes. Differential costs of reproduction and the mating system appear to be among the major factors producing differences in reproductive expectations between the sexes. On the intraspecific level, tests of the model consist of predicting the optimal size or age of sex change. In general, an individual should change sex if it can increase its reproductive value (future expected reproduction) by doing so. Reproductive values are often dependent on the local environment, local population demography, and the individual's own status, and labile sex change appears to be common. Many of the objections to the size-advantage model arise from confusion between the intraspecific and intraspecific versions.
Copyright © 1988. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1988        PMID: 21227182     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90176-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  23 in total

1.  Consequences of sex change for effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Stefano Mariani; Chiara Benvenuto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Origin and occurrence of sexual and mating systems in Crustacea: a progression towards communal living and eusociality.

Authors:  T Subramoniam
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Drivers of protogynous sex change differ across spatial scales.

Authors:  Brett M Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Size-dependent gender modification in Lilium apertum (Liliaceae): does this species exhibit gender diphasy?

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Xing-Fu Zhu; Hang Sun; Yong-Ping Yang; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Understanding hermaphrodite species through game theory.

Authors:  Amira Kebir; Nina H Fefferman; Slimane Ben Miled
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Fish sex: why so diverse?

Authors:  J K Desjardins; R D Fernald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Differing mechanisms underlie sexual size-dimorphism in two populations of a sex-changing fish.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Christopher A Ryen; Philip L Munday; Stefan P W Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex change and effective population size: implications for population genetic studies in marine fish.

Authors:  I Coscia; J Chopelet; R S Waples; B Q Mann; S Mariani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Bidirectional sex change in mushroom stony corals.

Authors:  Yossi Loya; Kazuhiko Sakai
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Time for a change: patterns of sex expression, health and mortality in a sex-changing tree.

Authors:  Jennifer Blake-Mahmud; Lena Struwe
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.