Literature DB >> 21227174

Visions of rationality.

V M Chase1, R Hertwig, G Gigerenzer.   

Abstract

The classical view that equates rationality with adherence to the laws of probability theory and logic has driven much research on inference. Recently, an increasing number of researchers have begun to espouse a view of rationality that takes account of organisms' adaptive goals, natural environments, and cognitive constraints. We argue that inference is carried out using boundedly rational heuristics, that is, heuristics that allow organisms to reach their goals under conditions of limited time, information, and computational capacity. These heuristics are ecologically rational in that they exploit aspects of both the physical and social environment in order to make adaptive inferences. We review recent work exploring this multifaceted conception of rationality.

Year:  1998        PMID: 21227174     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01179-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  9 in total

1.  Aggregate age-at-marriage patterns from individual mate-search heuristics.

Authors:  Peter M Todd; Francesco C Billari; Jorge Simão
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2005-08

2.  Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: implications for confirmation bias.

Authors:  Craig R M McKenzie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  Intuition versus analysis: strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving.

Authors:  Jean E Pretz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

4.  Nonhuman rationality: a predictive coding perspective.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei Hung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making.

Authors:  Anja Achtziger; Carlos Alós-Ferrer; Sabine Hügelschäfer; Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Good thinking or gut feeling? Cognitive reflection and intuition in traders, bankers and financial non-experts.

Authors:  Volker Thoma; Elliott White; Asha Panigrahi; Vanessa Strowger; Irina Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A framework for building cognitive process models.

Authors:  Jana B Jarecki; Jolene H Tan; Mirjam A Jenny
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

9.  Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts.

Authors:  Emily Kubin; Curtis Puryear; Chelsea Schein; Kurt Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.