Literature DB >> 21226466

Automated strategies to identify compounds on the basis of GC/EI-MS and calculated properties.

Emma L Schymanski1, Markus Meringer, Werner Brack.   

Abstract

The identification of unknown compounds based on GC/EI-MS spectrum and structure generation techniques has been improved by combining a number of strategies into a programmed sequence. The program MOLGEN-MS is used to determine the molecular formula and incorporate substructural information to generate all structures matching the mass spectral information. Mass spectral fragments are then predicted for each structure and compared with the experimental spectrum using a match value. Additional data are then calculated automatically for each candidate to allow exclusion of candidates that did not match other analytical information. The effectiveness of these "exclusion criteria", as well as the programming sequence, was tested using a case study of 29 isomers of formula C(12)H(10)O(2). The default classifier precision resulted in the generation of too many structures in some cases, which was improved by up to several orders of magnitude by including additional classifiers or restrictions. Combining this with the exclusion of candidates based on a Lee retention index/boiling point correlation, octanol-water partitioning coefficients, steric energies, and finally spectral match values limited the number of candidate structures further from over 1 billion without any restrictions down to less than 6 structures in 10 cases and below 35 in all but 3 cases. This method can be used in the absence of matching database spectra and brings unknown identification based on MS interpretation and structure generation techniques a step closer to practical reality.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21226466     DOI: 10.1021/ac102574h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  8 in total

1.  Applying in-silico retention index and mass spectra matching for identification of unknown metabolites in accurate mass GC-TOF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sangeeta Kumari; Doug Stevens; Tobias Kind; Carsten Denkert; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Integrated Framework for Identifying Toxic Transformation Products in Complex Environmental Mixtures.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Ivan A Titaley; Eunha Hoh; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2017-01-04

3.  BioSM: metabolomics tool for identifying endogenous mammalian biochemical structures in chemical structure space.

Authors:  Mai A Hamdalla; Ion I Mandoiu; Dennis W Hill; Sanguthevar Rajasekaran; David F Grant
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Understanding and classifying metabolite space and metabolite-likeness.

Authors:  Julio E Peironcely; Theo Reijmers; Leon Coulier; Andreas Bender; Thomas Hankemeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Small Molecule Identification with MOLGEN and Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Markus Meringer; Emma L Schymanski
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2013-05-28

6.  Clinical Validation of a Highly Sensitive GC-MS Platform for Routine Urine Drug Screening and Real-Time Reporting of up to 212 Drugs.

Authors:  Hari Nair; Fred Woo; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-10

7.  OMG: Open Molecule Generator.

Authors:  Julio E Peironcely; Miguel Rojas-Chertó; Davide Fichera; Theo Reijmers; Leon Coulier; Jean-Loup Faulon; Thomas Hankemeier
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  Automated fragment formula annotation for electron ionisation, high resolution mass spectrometry: application to atmospheric measurements of halocarbons.

Authors:  Myriam Guillevic; Aurore Guillevic; Martin K Vollmer; Paul Schlauri; Matthias Hill; Lukas Emmenegger; Stefan Reimann
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.514

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.