Literature DB >> 21225630

Data-driven modeling of phase interactions between spontaneous MEG oscillations.

Rikkert Hindriks1, Fetsje Bijma, Bob W van Dijk, Cornelis J Stam, Ysbrand Y van der Werf, Eus J W van Someren, Jan C de Munck, Aad W van der Vaart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Synchronization between distributed rhythms in the brain is commonly assessed by estimating the synchronization strength from simultaneous measurements. This approach, however, does not elucidate the phase dynamics that underlies synchronization. For this, an explicit dynamical model is required. Based on the assumption that the recorded rhythms can be described as weakly coupled oscillators, we propose a method for characterizing their phase-interaction dynamics.
METHODS: We propose to model ongoing magnetoencephalographic (MEG) oscillations as weakly coupled oscillators. Based on this model, the phase interactions between simultaneously recorded signals are characterized by estimating the modulation in instantaneous frequency as a function of their phase difference. Furthermore, we mathematically derive the effect of volume conduction on the model and show how indices for strength and direction of coupling can be derived.
RESULTS: The methodology is tested using simulations and is applied to ongoing occipital-frontal MEG oscillations of healthy subjects in the alpha and beta bands during rest. The simulations show that the model is robust against the presence of noise, short observation times, and model violations. The application to MEG data shows that the model can reconstruct the observed occipital-frontal phase difference distributions. Furthermore, it suggests that phase locking in the alpha and beta band is established by qualitatively different mechanisms.
CONCLUSION: When the recorded rhythms are assumed to be weakly coupled oscillators, a dynamical model for the phase interactions can be fitted to data. The model is able to reconstruct the observed phase difference distribution, and hence, provides a dynamical explanation for observed phase locking.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225630      PMCID: PMC6869992          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  19 in total

Review 1.  The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling.

Authors:  K J Friston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Fine temporal resolution of analytic phase reveals episodic synchronization by state transitions in gamma EEGs.

Authors:  Walter J Freeman; Linda J Rogers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Nonlinear phase desynchronization in human electroencephalographic data.

Authors:  Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators.

Authors:  M G Rosenblum; A S Pikovsky
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-09-21

5.  Identification of coupling direction: application to cardiorespiratory interaction.

Authors:  Michael G Rosenblum; Laura Cimponeriu; Anastasios Bezerianos; Andreas Patzak; Ralf Mrowka
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-03-28

6.  Statistical method for detection of phase-locking episodes in neural oscillations.

Authors:  Jose M Hurtado; Leonid L Rubchinsky; Karen A Sigvardt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Measuring phase synchronization of superimposed signals.

Authors:  Frank C Meinecke; Andreas Ziehe; Jürgen Kurths; Klaus-Robert Müller
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 8.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals.

Authors:  Ernesto Pereda; Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Dynamics of spontaneous transitions between global brain states.

Authors:  Junji Ito; Andrey R Nikolaev; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Intelligence and EEG phase reset: a two compartmental model of phase shift and lock.

Authors:  R W Thatcher; D M North; C J Biver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neural oscillations are a start toward understanding brain activity rather than the end.

Authors:  Keith B Doelling; M Florencia Assaneo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Establishing Communication between Neuronal Populations through Competitive Entrainment.

Authors:  Mark Wildie; Murray Shanahan
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Lag-invariant detection of interactions in spatially-extended systems using linear inverse modeling.

Authors:  Rikkert Hindriks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.