Literature DB >> 21225611

Accuracy of sonographic weight estimation as a function of fetal sex.

N Melamed1, A Ben-Haroush, I Meizner, R Mashiach, M Glezerman, Y Yogev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation is related to fetal sex.
METHODS: The accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation was compared between male and female fetuses using 3672 sonographic weight estimations performed within 3 days prior to delivery. Fetal weight was estimated using eight regression models that are based on different combinations of the following biometric parameters: abdominal circumference (AC), femur diaphysis length (FL), biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumference (HC).
RESULTS: In seven out of the eight models tested, the presence of a male fetus was associated with a significantly lower systematic error compared with a female fetus (-0.2 to 2.1% vs. 1.3 to 6%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, fetal sex was independently associated with sonographic accuracy so that the likelihood of a weight estimation within 10% of birth weight was 30% higher for male fetuses compared with female fetuses. The biometric parameters that contributed most to these sex-related differences were FL and AC, while models that included HC were associated with the lowest differences in the systematic error between male fetuses and female fetuses. For most models, the random error and correlation between estimated weight and birth weight were not affected by fetal sex (8.1-12.8% vs. 8.2-13.6%, and 0.856-0.944 vs. 0.842-0.944, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight is more accurate for male fetuses than for female fetuses. The use of sex-specific models may improve the accuracy of fetal weight estimation for female fetuses.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225611     DOI: 10.1002/uog.8914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  7 in total

1.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Analysis of factors influencing accuracy of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Sujitkumar Hiwale; Celine Firtion
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-13

3.  Stillbirth and the small fetus: use of a sex-specific versus a non-sex-specific growth standard.

Authors:  A S Trudell; A G Cahill; M G Tuuli; G A Macones; A O Odibo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth patterns: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Zoe A Broere-Brown; Esme Baan; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; Bero O Verburg; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Analysis of the effectiveness of ultrasound and clinical examination methods in fetal weight estimation for term pregnancies.

Authors:  Mehmet Zahran; Yusuf Aytaç Tohma; Salim Erkaya; Özlem Evliyaoğlu; Eser Çolak; Bora Çoşkun
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation in full-term singleton pregnant women.

Authors:  Emre Erdem Tas; Edip Alptug Kir; Gamze Yilmaz; Ayse Filiz Yavuz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Measurement of abdominal circumference in preterm infants.

Authors:  Ilze Meldere; Valdis Urtans; Aigars Petersons; Zane Abola
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.