Literature DB >> 21225459

Performance and meat quality traits of beef heifers fed with two levels of concentrate and ruminally undegradable protein.

Marcio de Souza Duarte1, Pedro Veiga Rodrigues Paulino, Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Mario Fonseca Paulino, Edenio Detmann, Joanis Tilemahos Zervoudakis, João Paulo Ismerio dos Santos Monnerat, Gabriel da Silva Viana, Luiz Henrique P Silva, Nicola Vergara Lopes Serão.   

Abstract

The effects of two levels of concentrate and ruminally undegradable protein (RUP) on performance, intake, digestibility, carcass characteristics, meat quality traits, and commercial cuts yield were assessed. Twenty crossbred heifers (240 kg average body weight) were used. At the beginning of the trial, four animals were slaughtered as reference group and the 16 remaining animals were randomly assigned to four treatments, in a 2 × 2 factorial design: two levels of concentrate (40% and 80%, dry matter (DM) basis) and two levels of RUP (48.79% and 27.19% of CP). At the end of the trial, all the animals were slaughtered. There was no interaction (P > 0.05) between concentrate and RUP levels. Dry matter intake and nutrients digestibility was not affected (P > 0.05) by RUP level. Heifers fed the highest RUP level had greater (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG). Concentrate level did not affect (P > 0.05) DMI and ADG. Heifers fed diets with 80% concentrate had greater intake of TDN and EE, and lower intake of NDF (P < 0.05). The digestibilities of all nutrients, except the NDF, were greater (P < 0.05) for the 80% concentrate diets. The RUP levels did not affect (P > 0.05) the carcass characteristics and carcass gain composition. Heifers fed 80% concentrate diets had larger (P < 0.05) longissimus muscle area and lower gain of bones (P < 0.05). Concentrate level did not affect (P > 0.05) the composition of carcass gain. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of RUP and concentrate levels on meat quality traits and commercial cut yields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225459     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9778-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  9 in total

1.  Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study.

Authors:  David R Mertens
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.913

2.  Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds.

Authors:  Claudia B Sampaio; Edenio Detmann; Mario F Paulino; Sebastiao C Valadares Filho; Marjorrie A de Souza; Isis Lazzarini; Pedro V Rodrigues Paulino; Augusto C de Queiroz
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effect of undegradable intake protein supplementation on intake, digestion, microbial efficiency, in situ disappearance, and plasma hormones and metabolites in steers fed low-quality grass hay.

Authors:  J J Reed; M R O'Neil; G P Lardy; K A Vonnahme; L P Reynolds; J S Caton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Nutrient synchrony: sound in theory, elusive in practice.

Authors:  M B Hall; G B Huntington
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in Brahman steers and their association with carcass and tenderness traits.

Authors:  T Smith; M G Thomas; T D Bidner; J C Paschal; D E Franke
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2009-01-20

6.  Influence of different levels of concentrate and ruminally undegraded protein on digestive variables in beef heifers.

Authors:  D S Pina; S C Valadares Filho; L O Tedeschi; A M Barbosa; R F D Valadares
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of frequency and amount of rumen-degradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage.

Authors:  T A Wickersham; E C Titgemeyer; R C Cochran; E E Wickersham; E S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability.

Authors:  C J Sniffen; J D O'Connor; P J Van Soest; D G Fox; J B Russell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on nitrogen retention, apparent digestibility, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage.

Authors:  R L Atkinson; C D Toone; T J Robinson; D L Harmon; P A Ludden
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.159

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Dietary Concentrate:forage Ratios and Undegraded Dietary Protein on Nitrogen Balance and Urinary Excretion of Purine Derivatives in Dorper×thin-tailed Han Crossbred Lambs.

Authors:  Tao Ma; Kai-Dong Deng; Yan Tu; Cheng-Gang Jiang; Nai-Feng Zhang; Yan-Ling Li; Bing-Wen Si; Can Lou; Qi-Yu Diao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Effect of Two Nutritional Strategies to Balance Energy and Protein Supply in Fattening Heifers on Performance, Ruminal Metabolism, and Carcass Characteristics.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Arias; Gonzalo Guajardo; Stefan Kunick; Christian Alvarado-Gilis; Juan Pablo Keim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effect of Fresh Citrus Pulp Supplementation on Animal Performance and Meat Quality of Feedlot Steers.

Authors:  Santiago Luzardo; Georgget Banchero; Virginia Ferrari; Facundo Ibáñez; Gonzalo Roig; Valentín Aznárez; Juan Clariget; Alejandro La Manna
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.