BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has escalated over the past decade, despite the fact that clinical studies validating the efficacy of CAM remain sparse. Clinicians frequently encounter patients who reject standard treatment, but data on outcomes of patients choosing CAM as primary treatment for breast cancer are also lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients who refused/delayed standard treatments in favor of alternative therapies were identified in a community surgical practice over a 10-year period. A retrospective chart review was performed with telephone interviews when possible. Estimated 10-year survival given recommended treatment was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients was identified; median age was 53. Median follow-up was 54 months. Patients were stratified into 2 subgroups: those who omitted/delayed surgery (SSG, n = 26) and those who were nonadherent to adjuvant therapy recommendations (ASG, n = 35). In the SSG, 96.2% experienced disease progression; 50% died of disease. Mean stage at initial presentation was II; mean stage at re-presentation after primary treatment with alternative therapies was IV. Disease progression occurred in 86.2% of those in the ASG; 20% died of disease. The mean 10-year survival calculated for those omitting surgery was 69.5%; observed survival for this group was 36.4% at a median follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative therapies used as primary treatment for breast cancer are associated with disease progression and increased risk of recurrence and death. Diminished outcomes are more profound in those delaying/omitting surgery. Reviewing these results with our patients may help bridge the gap between CAM and standard treatments.
BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has escalated over the past decade, despite the fact that clinical studies validating the efficacy of CAM remain sparse. Clinicians frequently encounter patients who reject standard treatment, but data on outcomes of patients choosing CAM as primary treatment for breast cancer are also lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Breast cancerpatients who refused/delayed standard treatments in favor of alternative therapies were identified in a community surgical practice over a 10-year period. A retrospective chart review was performed with telephone interviews when possible. Estimated 10-year survival given recommended treatment was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients was identified; median age was 53. Median follow-up was 54 months. Patients were stratified into 2 subgroups: those who omitted/delayed surgery (SSG, n = 26) and those who were nonadherent to adjuvant therapy recommendations (ASG, n = 35). In the SSG, 96.2% experienced disease progression; 50% died of disease. Mean stage at initial presentation was II; mean stage at re-presentation after primary treatment with alternative therapies was IV. Disease progression occurred in 86.2% of those in the ASG; 20% died of disease. The mean 10-year survival calculated for those omitting surgery was 69.5%; observed survival for this group was 36.4% at a median follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative therapies used as primary treatment for breast cancer are associated with disease progression and increased risk of recurrence and death. Diminished outcomes are more profound in those delaying/omitting surgery. Reviewing these results with our patients may help bridge the gap between CAM and standard treatments.
Authors: M Shreyamsa; Devina Singh; Pooja Ramakant; Akshay Anand; Kul Ranjan Singh; Sasi Mouli; Anand Kumar Mishra; A A Sonkar Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; Ashley Wilder Smith; Stephanie M George; James T Gibson; Kathy B Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Catherine Duggan; Leslie Bernstein; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Rayna Kim Matsuno; Ian S Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec; Brian F Issell; Carolyn C Gotay Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: M Kalder; T Müller; D Fischer; A Müller; W Bader; M W Beckmann; C Brucker; C C Hack; V Hanf; A Hasenburg; A Hein; S Jud; M Kiechle; E Klein; D Paepke; A Rotmann; F Schütz; G Dobos; P Voiß; S Kümmel Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Oana Cristina Seremet; Octavian Tudorel Olaru; Claudia Maria Gutu; George Mihai Nitulescu; Mihaela Ilie; Simona Negres; Cristina Elena Zbarcea; Carmen Nicoleta Purdel; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristides M Tsatsakis; Michael D Coleman; Denisa Marilena Margina Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 2.952
Authors: Rosalina Richards; Bronwen McNoe; Ella Iosua; Anthony I Reeder; Richard Egan; Louise Marsh; Lindsay Robertson; Brett Maclennan; Anna Tiatia Faatoese Latu; Robin Quigg; Anne-Cathrine Petersen Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2017-12-29
Authors: Trine Stub; Frauke Musial; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; Anita Salamonsen; Agnete Kristoffersen; Gro Berntsen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 2.692