Literature DB >> 21224776

One, two-, and three-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with a local bone graft: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up.

Kazuhide Inage1, Seiji Ohtori, Takana Koshi, Munetaka Suzuki, Masashi Takaso, Masaomi Yamashita, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Gen Inoue, Sumihisa Orita, Yawara Eguchi, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Shunji Kishida, Kazuki Kuniyoshi, Yasuchika Aoki, Junichi Nakamura, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa, Gen Arai, Masayuki Miyagi, Hiroto Kamoda, Takane Suzuki, Tomoaki Toyone, Kazuhisa Takahashi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective trial.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the difference in bone union and clinical results after one-, two-, and three-level instrumented posterolateral fusion surgery using a local bone graft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The iliac crest bone graft technique for lumbar posterolateral fusion surgery is widely used; however, donor site problems such as pain and sensory disturbance have been reported. Local bone has been used for fusion surgery; however, its reliability as a graft for multiple segments has not been fully reported.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-two patients diagnosed with degenerated spondylolisthesis were divided into three groups [spondylolisthesis at 1 level (n = 42), at 2 levels (n = 40), and at 3 levels (n = 40)]. All patients underwent decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion with a local bone graft. The amount of bone graft, proportion of patients with (rate) and duration of bone union, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (JOAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated before and 2 years after therapy.
RESULTS: VAS score, JOA score, and ODI were not significantly different among the three groups before and after surgery (P > 0.05). Average amount of local bone graft used for one segment significantly decreased in proportion to the number of fusion levels (P < 0.05). The rate of bone union was 88% in the one-level group, 85% in the two-level group, and 62.5% in the three-level group, which was significantly lower than that in the one- and two-level groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: If one- and two-level posterolateral fusion were performed, the local bone graft technique provides a good and uniform bone union rate; however, for three-level fusion poor results were obtained because of an insufficient amount of local bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21224776     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f40e69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Alison Rushton; Martin L Verra; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom; J Bart Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; M S Nickoli; J C Wang; J R Lieberman; H S An; S T Yoon; J A Youssef; D S Brodke; C M McCullough
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-10-09

3.  The importance of proximal fusion level selection for outcomes of multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion.

Authors:  Woo Dong Nam; Jae Hwan Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02-10

4.  Bone Union Rate Following Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: Comparison between Demineralized Bone Matrix versus Hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Woo Dong Nam; Jemin Yi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08

5.  Lumbar Spine Fusion Rates With Local Bone in Posterolateral and Combined Posterolateral and Interbody Approaches.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Richard Roberts; Paul Arnold; David H Kim; Rick Sasso; Kevin C Baker; Jeffrey S Fischgrund
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Dong-Gune Chang; Jong-Beom Park; Yangjun Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Better Functional Recovery After Single-Level Compared With Two-Level Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Joshua T Bunch; Douglas C Burton; R Alden Milam Iv; Daniel K Park; K Brandon Strenge; Peter G Whang; Howard S An; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 8.  Ceramic-based bone grafts as a bone grafts extender for lumbar spine arthrodesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael S Nickoli; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.