Literature DB >> 21224767

Genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency according to the classification of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Hitoshi Kudo1, Ken-Ichi Furukawa, Toru Yokoyama, Atsushi Ono, Takuya Numasawa, Kanichiro Wada, Sunao Tanaka, Toru Asari, Kazumasa Ueyama, Shigeru Motomura, Satoshi Toh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: We categorized the four types of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine into two groups. We biochemically investigated the genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency between the two groups.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency according to the OPLL classification. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies on OPLL have revealed that the risk of progression of the ossification area is greatest for continuous and mixed type OPLL. However, until now, these four types of OPLL have been studied as a single condition.
METHODS: We categorized the four types of OPLL into the OPLL continuous (continuous or mixed type) and OPLL segmental groups (segmental or circumscribed type). Paraspinal ligaments were aseptically obtained from OPLL patients during surgery. The fibroblast-like cells that migrated from the explants were used for experiments. The cells were placed in a 60-mm culture dishes for total ribonucleic acid preparation and 12 well microplates for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity staining. After cultures reached confluence, the cells were cultured in osteogenic medium. The messenger ribonucleic acid expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), osterix, tumor necrosis factor-α-stimulated gene-6, and ALP was analyzed by quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction. Osteogenic differentiation of fibroblast-like cells was determined by histochemically detecting ALP production.
RESULTS: After osteogenic induction, BMP-2 expression increased in the OPLL continuous and segmental groups. Osterix expression increased in the OPLL continuous group only. Tumor necrosis factor-α-stimulated gene-6 expression was suppressed in the OPLL continuous and segmental groups. ALP expression as well as ALP activity staining was higher in the OPLL continuous group than in the OPLL segmental group. CONCLUSION.: The study revealed genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency between the OPLL continuous and segmental groups. We propose to distinguish OPLL continuous group from segmental group in biochemical studies on OPLL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21224767     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e9a8a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Two novel BMP-2 variants identified in patients with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Xiaochen Qu; Zhongqiang Chen; Dongwei Fan; Shen Xiang; Chuiguo Sun; Yan Zeng; Weishi Li; Zhaoqing Guo; Qiang Qi; Woquan Zhong; Yun Jiang
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kudo; Toru Yokoyama; Eiki Tsushima; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Sunao Tanaka; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Genetic differences in osteogenic differentiation potency in the thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum under cyclic mechanical stress.

Authors:  Shanglong Ning; Zhongqiang Chen; Dongwei Fan; Chuiguo Sun; Chi Zhang; Yan Zeng; Weishi Li; Xiaofei Hou; Xiaochen Qu; Yunlong Ma; Huilei Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Hiroaki Nakashima; So Kato; Michael Kryshtalskyj; Nagoshi Nagoshi; Aria Nouri; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-15

5.  Genetic Odyssey to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Young Il Won; Chang-Hyun Lee; Woon Tak Yuh; Shin Won Kwon; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 6.  Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Nonoperative and Operative Management.

Authors:  Rasheed Abiola; Paul Rubery; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Association of miR-146a, miR-149, miR-196a2, and miR-499 Polymorphisms with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Jae Joon Lim; Dong Ah Shin; Young Joo Jeon; Hemant Kumar; Seil Sohn; Hyoung Sik Min; Jang Bo Lee; Sung Uk Kuh; Keung Nyun Kim; Jung Oh Kim; Ok Joon Kim; Alexander E Ropper; Nam Keun Kim; In Bo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The microRNA-10a/ID3/RUNX2 axis modulates the development of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Hao Zhang; Wei Gu; Huiqiao Wu; Yuanyuan Chen; Wenchao Zhou; Baifeng Sun; Xiaolong Shen; Zicheng Zhang; Yue Wang; Yang Liu; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.