Literature DB >> 21224761

Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination in identifying the level of herniation in patients with sciatica.

Mark J Hancock1, Bart Koes, Raymond Ostelo, Wilco Peul.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross sectional
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of the neurological examination to identify the specific level of a disc herniation in patients with sciatica and confirmed disc herniation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Tests included in a neurological examination theoretically provide accurate diagnostic information about the level of the herniated disc. However, there is currently very little evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of individual tests or combinations of tests.
METHODS: The study included 283 patients with sciatica and confirmed disc herniation from a previous randomized controlled trial. The reference test for the current study was the MRI scan, reported for level of disc herniation. Index tests investigated were a neurologist's overall impression of the level of disc herniation, individual neurological tests (e.g., sensation testing) and multiple test findings (i.e., the number of positive tests). The index tests were performed blinded to the MRI results. The diagnostic accuracy of the index tests in predicting herniations at the lower three lumbar discs was investigated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: None of the individual neurological tests from the clinical examination was highly accurate for identifying the level of disc herniation (AUC < 0.75). The outcome of multiple test findings was slightly more accurate but did not produce high sensitivity and specificity. The dermatomal pain location was generally the most informative individual neurological test. The overall suspected level of disc herniation rated by the neurologist after a full examination of the patient was more accurate than individual tests. At L4/5 and L5/S1 herniations the AUC for neurologist ratings was 0.79 and 0.80 respectively.
CONCLUSION: The current study did not find evidence to support the accuracy of individual tests from the neurological examination in identifying the level of disc herniation demonstrated on MRI. A neurologist's overall impression was moderately accurate in identifying the level of disc herniation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21224761     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee7f78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Essential literature for the chiropractic profession: Results and implementation challenges from a survey of international chiropractic faculty.

Authors:  Barbara A Mansholt; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; John S Stites
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-08-02

2.  Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Trond Iversen; Tore K Solberg; Bertil Romner; Tom Wilsgaard; Øystein Nygaard; Knut Waterloo; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 3. Diagnosis.

Authors:  Takashi Kaito; Yu Yamato
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Diagnostic performance of the medial hamstring reflex in L5 radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ignatius Ngene Esene; Abdalla Meher; Mohamed A Elzoghby; Khaled El-Bahy; Ali Kotb; Adel El-Hakim
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.