STUDY DESIGN: To examine the effects of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist (etanercept) on rat spinal cord injury and identify a possible mechanism for its action. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the contribution of etanercept to the pathologic cascade in spinal cord injury and its possible suppression of neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Etanercept has been recently used successfully for treatment of inflammatory disorders. However, only a few studies have examined its role in suppressing neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis in spinal cord injury. METHODS: Etanercept or saline (control) was administered by intraperitoneal injection 1 hour after thoracic spinal cord injury in rats. The expressions and localizations of TNF-α, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), and TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) were examined by immunoblot and immunohistochemical analyses. Spinal cord tissue damage between saline- and etanercept-treated groups was also compared after hematoxylin-eosin and luxol fast blue (LFB) staining. The Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scale was used to evaluate rat locomotor function after etanercept administration. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells were counted and the immunoreactivity to active caspase-3 and caspase-8 was examined after etanercept administration. RESULTS: Immunoblot and double immunofluorescence staining revealed suppression of TNF-α, TNFR1, and TNFR2 expression after administration of etanercept in the acute phase of spinal cord injury. LFB staining demonstrated potential myelination in the etanercept-treated group from 2 week after spinal cord injury, together with an increased BBB locomotor score. Double immunofluorescence staining showed a significant decrease in TUNEL-positive neurons and oligodendroglia from 12 hour to 1 week in the gray and white matters after etanercept administration. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated overexpression of activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 after spinal cord injury, which was markedly inhibited by etanercept. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that etanercept reduces the associated tissue damage of spinal cord injury, improves hindlimb locomotor function, and facilitates myelin regeneration. This positive effect of etanercept on spinal cord injury is probably attributable to the suppression of TNF-α, TNFR1, TNFR2, and activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 overexpressions, and the inhibition of neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis.
STUDY DESIGN: To examine the effects of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist (etanercept) on ratspinal cord injury and identify a possible mechanism for its action. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the contribution of etanercept to the pathologic cascade in spinal cord injury and its possible suppression of neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Etanercept has been recently used successfully for treatment of inflammatory disorders. However, only a few studies have examined its role in suppressing neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis in spinal cord injury. METHODS: Etanercept or saline (control) was administered by intraperitoneal injection 1 hour after thoracic spinal cord injury in rats. The expressions and localizations of TNF-α, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), and TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) were examined by immunoblot and immunohistochemical analyses. Spinal cord tissue damage between saline- and etanercept-treated groups was also compared after hematoxylin-eosin and luxol fast blue (LFB) staining. The Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scale was used to evaluate rat locomotor function after etanercept administration. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells were counted and the immunoreactivity to active caspase-3 and caspase-8 was examined after etanercept administration. RESULTS: Immunoblot and double immunofluorescence staining revealed suppression of TNF-α, TNFR1, and TNFR2 expression after administration of etanercept in the acute phase of spinal cord injury. LFB staining demonstrated potential myelination in the etanercept-treated group from 2 week after spinal cord injury, together with an increased BBB locomotor score. Double immunofluorescence staining showed a significant decrease in TUNEL-positive neurons and oligodendroglia from 12 hour to 1 week in the gray and white matters after etanercept administration. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated overexpression of activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 after spinal cord injury, which was markedly inhibited by etanercept. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that etanercept reduces the associated tissue damage of spinal cord injury, improves hindlimb locomotor function, and facilitates myelin regeneration. This positive effect of etanercept on spinal cord injury is probably attributable to the suppression of TNF-α, TNFR1, TNFR2, and activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 overexpressions, and the inhibition of neuronal and oligodendroglial apoptosis.