Literature DB >> 21224267

Effectiveness of search strategies for qualitative research about barriers and facilitators of program delivery.

Mark Pearson1, Tiffany Moxham, Kate Ashton.   

Abstract

Electronic database search strategies have developed substantially over the course of the past two decades, but their optimal use within a broader search strategy remains unclear. This article evaluates the use of a range of search strategies to identify qualitative evidence on the implementation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention programs. Within the time-limited context of the production of a policy-relevant systematic review, the authors found the protocol-driven, targeted, and reference-checking search strategies to be the most effective, while obtaining authors' suggestions proved to be a resource-intensive process with negligible results. Weaknesses in the indexing of qualitative research in electronic literature databases mean that the sensitivity of searches may need to be reduced to allow time for other search strategies to be implemented. Expert knowledge may be optimally used through involving experts in the design and implementation of a search strategy, rather than solely as a source of citations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21224267     DOI: 10.1177/0163278710388029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  The selection of search sources influences the findings of a systematic review of people's views: a case study in public health.

Authors:  Claire Stansfield; Josephine Kavanagh; Rebecca Rees; Alan Gomersall; James Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Susan C Slade; Peter Kent; Tracey Bucknall; Elizabeth Molloy; Shilpa Patel; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER).

Authors:  Andrew Booth; Janet Harris; Elizabeth Croot; Jane Springett; Fiona Campbell; Emma Wilkins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.

Authors:  Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 5.  A narrative systematic review of factors affecting diabetes prevention in primary care settings.

Authors:  Josie Messina; Stephen Campbell; Rebecca Morris; Emily Eyles; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Organizational determinants of interprofessional collaboration in integrative health care: systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Vincent C H Chung; Polly H X Ma; Lau Chun Hong; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 8.  Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies.

Authors:  Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Jo Varley-Campbell; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

Authors:  L J Convie; E Carson; D McCusker; R S McCain; N McKinley; W J Campbell; S J Kirk; M Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.