| Literature DB >> 21223541 |
Giovanni Cianchi1, Manuela Bonizzoli, Andrea Pasquini, Massimo Bonacchi, Giovanni Zagli, Marco Ciapetti, Guido Sani, Stefano Batacchi, Simona Biondi, Pasquale Bernardo, Chiara Lazzeri, Valtere Giovannini, Alberta Azzi, Rosanna Abbate, Gianfranco Gensini, Adriano Peris.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the first outbreak of a respiratory illness caused by H1N1 virus in Mexico, several reports have described the need of intensive care or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance in young and often healthy patients. Here we describe our experience in H1N1-induced ARDS using both ventilation strategy and ECMO assistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21223541 PMCID: PMC3022902 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Italian Ministry of Health criteria to discuss the need of ECMO.
| 1. SaO2 < 85% for at least 1 hour |
| 2. Oxygenation Index >25 for at least 6 hours after ventilation optimisation |
| 3. PaO2/FiO2 < 100 with PEEP ≥ 10cmH2O for at least 6 hours after ventilation's optimization |
| 4. Hypercapnia with pH < 7.25 |
| 5. SvO2 < 65% with hematocrit >30 and under vasoactive drugs infusion |
The parameter are referred to a condition of lung protective ventilation (tidal volume:4-6 ml/Kg of predicted body weight; plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH20; PEEP >lower inflection point of the curve pressure-volume).
PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; PaO2: arterial oxygen partial pressure; FiO2: inspired oxygen fraction; RR: respiratory rate; SaO2: peripheral oxygen saturation; SvO2: central venous oxygen saturation.
Oxygenation Index: Mean airway pressure (cmH2O) * FiO2 * 100/PaO2;
baseline and clinical characteristics of H1N1-pneumonia patients.
| Number | 12 |
|---|---|
| 8 (66 .7%) | |
| 44.5 (36.8-48.8) | |
| 27 (23.8-31) | |
| 36 (27.75-44.75) | |
| 5 (41 .7%) | |
| 2 (16 .7%) | |
| 7 (6-8.25) | |
| 92 (53.5-119.5) | |
| 65 (39.9-83) | |
| 7.37 (7.32-7.50) | |
| 8.62 (6.87-11.3) | |
| 8.620 (6.870-11.300) | |
| 158.5 (102-217.3) | |
| 617 (391.2-919.8) | |
| 611 (402.5-893.8) | |
| 53.5 (39.8-121.3) | |
| 37.5 (27.3-43.5) | |
| 80.5 (35.9-132.4) | |
| 0.87 (0.69-1.26) | |
| 3.2 (1.1-4.3) | |
| 7.3 | |
| 1.25 | |
| 5 (41 .7%) | |
| 7 (58 .3%) | |
| 2 (16 .7%) | |
| 13.5 (10.8-21.5) | |
| 16.5 (10.5-25.5) | |
| 1 (8 .3%) | |
Data are referred to first assessment at ICU admission. Continuous data are represented as medians with 25th to 75th interquartile range (IQR). Percent data are referred to the total population of each group.
BMI: body mass index; CVVH: continuous veno-venous hemofiltration; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; SAPS: simplified acute physiology score.
§ values at ICU admission
Figure 1Time course of RT-PCR results on pharyngeal swab and bronchoalveolar lavage.
differences between ECMO and ventilated patients.
| ECMO patients | Non-ECMO patients | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 5 | |
| 6 (85 .7%) | 2 (40%) | |
| 45 (37-46.5) | 42 (39-51) | |
| 27 (23.5-36.5) | 27 (25-29) | |
| 44 (39-50.5) | 28 (27-28) | |
| 5 (71 .4%) | 2 (40%) | |
| 2 (28 .6%) | 0 | |
| 6 (6-7.5) | 7 (7-9) | |
| 48.7 (46.8-58) | 116 (107-141) | |
| 81.6 (60.6-88) | 57 (55.8-63) | |
| 7.25 (7.20-7.30) | 7.33 (7.28-7.34) | |
| 10 (8.5-15) | 20 (18-22) | |
| 14 (11-15) | 14 (11-15) | |
| 34 (30-38) | 32 (23-38) | |
| 11 (9.1-13.3) | 7.03 (6.7-8.6) | |
| 151 (115.5-218.5) | 158.5 (125.3-182.5) | |
| 445 (372.5-920.5) | 627 (607-632) | |
| 477 (189-890.3) | 435 (281.5-695) | |
| 54 (42-121.5) | 53 (42-78) | |
| 38 (25.5-41) | 37 (29-45) | |
| 83.5 (77.5-315.7) | 127.5 (96.3-158.8) | |
| 1.02 (0.79-1.72) | 0.81 (0.55-0.85) | |
| 4.3 (2.7-29.4) | 1.9 (0.2-2.6) | |
| 2 (28 .6%) | 0 | |
| 9.6 | 4.2 | |
| 1.6 | 0.8 | |
| 19 (12-36) | 9 (5-11) | |
| 23 (17.5-38) | 11 (8-14) | |
| 4 (1-6) | 1 (0-3) | |
| 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
Data on airway pressures and respiratory rate are referred after intubation and recruitment. Continuous data are represented as medians with 25th to 75th interquartile range (IQR). Percent data are referred to the total population of each group.
BMI: body mass index; CVVH: continuous veno-venous hemofiltration; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; SAPS: simplified acute physiology score.
§ Values at ICU admission
main ventilation and ECMO data of patients treated with ECMO
| Pre-ECMO parameters | In-ECMO parameters (Day 1) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Age (years) | Comorbidity | Peak Pressure | PEEP | tV | RR | pH | Ventilation days before ECMO | Peak Pressure | PEEP | tV | RR | Pump Flow | Days on ECMO | Ventilation days after ECMO | ||
| 15 | Asthma | 30 | 14 | 350 | 14 | 50 | 52 | 7.18 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 300 | 10 | 5.2 | 6 | 3 | |
| 58 | - | 30 | 14 | 400 | 16 | 66 | 76 | 7.14 | 2 | 22 | 14 | 300 | 7 | 5.0 | 6 | 5 | |
| 44 | Obesity | 33 | 15 | 240 | 20 | 60 | 89 | 7.27 | 2 | 28 | 15 | 200 | 9 | 6.1 | 15^ | 12 | |
| 48 | Cigarette smoke | 40 | 10 | 700 | 18 | 58 | 54 | 7.29 | 1 | 24 | 14 | 270 | 7 | 5.9 | 8 | 10^ | |
| 30 | Asthma, obesity, cigarette smoke | 35 | 15 | 700 | 22 | 48 | 55 | 7,22 | 2 | 24 | 14 | 400 | 6 | 5.3 | 6 | 3 | |
| 45 | Psychiatric disorder, emphysema bulla | 45 | 18 | 250 | 20 | 54 | 73 | 7.22 | 6 | 28 | 17 | 160 | 8 | 5.7 | 37#^ | - | |
| 45 | - | 35 | 15 | 410 | 32 | 73 | 84 | 7.17 | 7 | 25 | 15 | 300 | 20 | 5.0 | 18 | 21^ | |
PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure; RR: respiratory rate; tV: tidal volume.
* Measured with FiO2 = 1
§ Patient referred from another hospital
# Dead on ECMO
^ patient tracheostomized during ECMO