Literature DB >> 21223370

Impact of preload alteration on left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using tissue velocity imaging echocardiography.

Min-Seok Kim1, Hyung-Kwan Kim, Sung-A Chang, Song-Yi Kim, Goo-Yeong Cho, Yong-Jin Kim, Dae-Won Sohn, Byung-Hee Oh, Young-Bae Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We lack full understanding on the determinants of left ventricular (LV) systolic mechanical dyssynchrony. We here tried to evaluate the effect of preload alterations on LV dyssynchrony using echocardiographic tissue velocity imaging.
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with a history of heart failure who were in sinus rhythm (24 men, mean age of 61 ± 12 years [range, 26-82]) were consecutively recruited. Twenty-four patients were allocated into a mild diastolic dysfunction group (Gr 1), and 14 to an advanced diastolic dysfunction group, which included pseudonormalization or restrictive mitral inflow patterns (Gr 2). The leg-raising maneuver was performed for 5 minutes in Gr 1, whereas two tablets (1.2 mg) of sublingual nitroglycerin (SLNG) were given to Gr 2 to manipulate preload status. An index representing LV systolic mechanical dyssynchony (DYSsys) was defined as the maximal differences in time intervals from the QRS onset to the systolic peak velocities in 4 basal segments derived from the apical four- and two-chamber views.
RESULTS: DYSsys decreased significantly after SLNG administration (74.2 ± 50.2 vs. 46.9 ± 34.8 ms, P < 0.01), whereas it showed a significant elevation after leg-raising maneuver (76.3 ± 33.5 vs. 88.8 ± 37.5 ms, P < 0.05). Maximal difference in DYSsys between before and after SLNG administration in a patient of Gr 2 was estimated to be 120.2, whereas with the leg-raising maneuver, maximal difference in DYSsys in a patient of Gr 1 was found to be 66.8. Changes in heart rate induced by preload manipulation did not display any association with changes in DYSsys.
CONCLUSIONS: DYSsys is significantly affected by preload alterations, and thus it can be considered a "dynamic" parameter that could be modified depending on the loading status. Therefore, loading status of individual patients should be considered when DYSsys is assessed.
© 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21223370     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01288.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  3 in total

1.  The impact of change in volume and left-ventricular hypertrophy on left-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in children with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Sheetal R Patel; Tej K Mattoo; Rudolph P Valentini; Sanjeev Aggarwal
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Renal sympathetic denervation inhibits the development of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony during the progression of heart failure in dogs.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Qing-yan Zhao; Sheng-bo Yu; Bin Sun; Liao Chen; Sheng Cao; Rui-qiang Guo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.062

3.  Is dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony a novel surrogate marker in the patient with hypertension?

Authors:  Wook-Jin Chung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.