Literature DB >> 2122251

A comparison between heparin and low-dose aspirin as adjunctive therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial (HART) Investigators.

J Hsia1, W P Hamilton, N Kleiman, R Roberts, B R Chaitman, A M Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report the results of the Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial, a collaborative study comparing early intravenous heparin with oral aspirin as adjunctive treatment when recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is used for coronary thrombolysis during acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Two hundred five patients were randomly assigned to receive either immediate and then continuous intravenous heparin (starting with a 5000-unit bolus; n = 106) or immediate and then daily oral aspirin (80 mg; n = 99) together with rt-PA (100 mg intravenously over a six-hour period) initiated within six hours of the onset of symptoms. We evaluated the patency of the infarct-related artery by angiography 7 to 24 hours after beginning rt-PA infusion, the frequency of reocclusion of the artery by repeat angiography on day 7, and ischemic or hemorrhagic complications during the hospital stay.
RESULTS: At the time of the first angiogram, 82 percent of the infarct-related arteries in the patients assigned to heparin were patent, as compared with only 52 percent in the aspirin group (P less than 0.0001). Of the initially patent vessels, 88 percent remained patent after seven days in the heparin group, as compared with 95 percent in the aspirin group (P not significant). The numbers of hemorrhagic events (18 in the heparin and 15 in the aspirin group) and recurrent ischemic events (8 in the heparin and 2 in the aspirin group) were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary patency rates associated with rt-PA are higher with early concomitant systemic heparin treatment than with concomitant low-dose oral aspirin. This observation has important implications for clinical practice and should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical trials involving coronary thrombolytic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2122251     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199011223232101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  48 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Antithrombin agents as adjuncts to thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  J K French; H D White
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Enhancing Thrombolysis with Adjunctive Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Treating myocardial infarction in the post-GUSTO era. A US perspective.

Authors:  D B Mark
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Treating myocardial infarction in the post-GUSTO era. A European perspective.

Authors:  M J de Boer; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Advances in thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  M Verstraete
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Current status of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Stein; R Roberts
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

8.  Is thrombolysis alone the best therapy for acute myocardial infarction? Current status and emerging strategies.

Authors:  P Golino; J T Willerson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

9.  Physicians' Use of Heparin Following Thrombolytic Therapy: An International Perspective.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Early reactivation of ischaemia after abrupt discontinuation of heparin in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Di Tano; A Mazzù
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.