Literature DB >> 21221988

Prediction of oxygen uptake during over-ground walking in people with and without Down syndrome.

Stamatis Agiovlasitis1, Robert W Motl, Sushant M Ranadive, Christopher A Fahs, Huimin Yan, George H Echols, Lindy Rossow, Bo Fernhall.   

Abstract

The reduced gait stability and aerobic fitness of people with Down syndrome (DS) may increase their rate of gross oxygen uptake (gross-VO(2)) during over-ground walking. If so, the ACSM equation predicting gross-VO(2) from speed may not be appropriate and an equation specifically for these individuals may be needed. This study therefore examined whether the relationship between gross-VO(2) and speed differs between individuals with and without DS during over-ground walking and attempted to develop a gross-VO(2) prediction equation for people with DS. Gross-VO(2) was measured in 18 persons with DS (24.7 ± 6.8 years; 8 men) and 22 persons without DS (25.9 ± 4.8 years; 9 men) at rest and during five over-ground walking trials, each lasting 6 min, at 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5 m/s. Multi-level modeling with random intercepts and slopes demonstrated significant effects of speed, group, group-by-speed interaction, and speed squared (P < 0.001). In each group, actual gross-VO(2) did not differ from gross-VO(2) predicted by the regression equation across speeds. Bland-Altman plots showed somewhat greater variability in the difference between actual and predicted gross-VO(2) for participants with DS. Mean absolute error of prediction was 10.75 and 10.67% for participants with and without DS, respectively. In participants with DS, the ACSM formula under-estimated gross-VO(2) across speeds, whereas, in participants without DS, only at 1.5 m/s (P < 0.001). Therefore, individuals with DS show altered curvilinear gross-VO(2) to speed relationship during over-ground walking. The present regression equation appears to offer accurate prediction in people with DS and could be used for prescribing over-ground walking intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21221988     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1812-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  25 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Attitudinal and psychosocial outcomes of a fitness and health education program on adults with down syndrome.

Authors:  Tamar Heller; Kelly Hsieh; James H Rimmer
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2004-03

3.  Prevalence of physical inactivity and recommended physical activity in community-based adults with mental retardation.

Authors:  Christopher C Draheim; Daniel P Williams; Jeffrey A McCubbin
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  2002-12

4.  Cardiorespiratory capacity of individuals with mental retardation including Down syndrome.

Authors:  B Fernhall; K H Pitetti; J H Rimmer; J A McCubbin; P Rintala; A L Millar; J Kittredge; L N Burkett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking.

Authors:  Raymond C Browning; Emily A Baker; Jessica A Herron; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-10-06

6.  Mechanical and metabolic requirements for active lateral stabilization in human walking.

Authors:  J M J Maxwell Donelan; D W David W Shipman; Rodger Kram; A D Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Isokinetic arm and leg strength of adults with Down syndrome: a comparative study.

Authors:  K H Pitetti; M Climstein; M J Mays; P J Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Modeling dynamic resource utilization in populations with unique constraints: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  Beverly D Ulrich; Victoria Haehl; Ugo H Buzzi; Masayoshi Kubo; Kenneth G Holt
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 9.  Determinants of oxygen uptake. Implications for exercise testing.

Authors:  D C Poole; R S Richardson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.