BACKGROUND: Resistant benign esophageal strictures can have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. A portion of these patients require frequent physician performed dilations, leading to numerous interactions with their attendant inconvenience and sense of dependence. This study demonstrates the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life of this under-utilized technique. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing esophageal self dilation at our institution between January 2003 and November 2009. The impact on quality of life was evaluated using a telephone questionnaire specifically designed to explore emotional, social and financial impacts. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who initially began self dilation for non-malignant strictures, nine are included in this study. Median follow-up was 35.4 months (range 6-168). No significant complications were reported. When asked to compare self dilation with physician performed dilation a large proportion of patients reported financial benefits, and a majority reported being more socially active. Overall quality of life improvement was reported by almost all of the participants in the study. Global scores for dysphagia and overall quality of life were significantly improved under conditions of self dilation versus physician performed dilation (P = 0.008 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that esophageal self dilation can be a safe and effective treatment modality in motivated patients with benign resistant esophageal strictures. Esophageal self dilation has a positive impact on emotional, social, and financial aspects of patient's life. Self dilation should be considered a treatment option in all patients with benign resistant esophageal strictures.
BACKGROUND: Resistant benign esophageal strictures can have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. A portion of these patients require frequent physician performed dilations, leading to numerous interactions with their attendant inconvenience and sense of dependence. This study demonstrates the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life of this under-utilized technique. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing esophageal self dilation at our institution between January 2003 and November 2009. The impact on quality of life was evaluated using a telephone questionnaire specifically designed to explore emotional, social and financial impacts. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who initially began self dilation for non-malignant strictures, nine are included in this study. Median follow-up was 35.4 months (range 6-168). No significant complications were reported. When asked to compare self dilation with physician performed dilation a large proportion of patients reported financial benefits, and a majority reported being more socially active. Overall quality of life improvement was reported by almost all of the participants in the study. Global scores for dysphagia and overall quality of life were significantly improved under conditions of self dilation versus physician performed dilation (P = 0.008 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that esophageal self dilation can be a safe and effective treatment modality in motivated patients with benign resistant esophageal strictures. Esophageal self dilation has a positive impact on emotional, social, and financial aspects of patient's life. Self dilation should be considered a treatment option in all patients with benign resistant esophageal strictures.
Authors: D J Patterson; D Y Graham; J L Smith; J T Schwartz; E Alpert; F L Lanza; G D Cain Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1983-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Judith McElhiney; Matthew R Lohse; Amindra S Arora; Joanna M Peloquin; Debra M Geno; Melissa M Kuntz; Felicity B Enders; Mary Fredericksen; Adil A Abdalla; Yulia Khan; Nicholas J Talley; Nancy N Diehl; Timothy J Beebe; Ann M Harris; Gianrico Farrugia; Darlene E Graner; Joseph A Murray; G Richard Locke; Rayna M Grothe; Michael D Crowell; Dawn L Francis; April M B Grudell; Tushar Dabade; Angelica Ramirez; MhdMaan Alkhatib; Jeffrey A Alexander; Jessica Kimber; Ganapathy Prasad; Alan R Zinsmeister; Yvonne Romero Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2009-10-24 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: R D Marks; J E Richter; J Rizzo; R E Koehler; J G Spenney; T P Mills; G Champion Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Adam M Collison; Leon A Sokulsky; Joseph D Sherrill; Scott Nightingale; Luke Hatchwell; Nicholas J Talley; Marjorie M Walker; Marc E Rothenberg; Joerg Mattes Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Ivana Dzeletovic; David E Fleischer; Michael D Crowell; Rahul Pannala; Lucinda A Harris; Francisco C Ramirez; George E Burdick; Lauri A Rentz; Robert V Spratley; Susan D Helling; Jeffrey A Alexander Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: C Gambardella; A Allaria; G Siciliano; C Mauriello; R Patrone; N Avenia; A Polistena; A Sanguinetti; S Napolitano; G Conzo Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Sarmed S Sami; Hasan N Haboubi; Yeng Ang; Philip Boger; Pradeep Bhandari; John de Caestecker; Helen Griffiths; Rehan Haidry; Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Praful Patel; Stuart Paterson; Krish Ragunath; Peter Watson; Peter D Siersema; Stephen E Attwood Journal: Gut Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Emo E van Halsema; Chantal A 't Hoen; Patricia S de Koning; Wilda D Rosmolen; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jacques J Bergman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 4.584